Aww, that's kind of too bad.
I *may* be wrong. Of course, I'm checking the Wiki, but it's been edited since he finished the marathons, and all the transvestism is mentioned in present-tense, with no mention of the interview I *vaguely* remember.
He could still be my-kinda-weird (without playing for my team, of course). That would be grand.
I read an article where he said he had been in "man mode" for a while, but did not say anything about his "girl mode" being a phase.
Maybe it has seasons.
I didn't know he was so political...he's certainly clever enough. Maybe he should bring a flag, just in case.ETA: Aims!(or anyone who really dug the West Wing) what was the name of the Josh Lyman fangirl website?
Maybe he should bring a flag, just in case.
"I claim this British ex-Empire in the name of penguins!"
"You can't let him do that in the House of Commons."
"Well, I had to. He had a flag."
Calli, thanks. I almost had it right, then.
Jilli there is a very young, gothy parent of one of Liv's preschool classmates. She has a set of awesome Jack Skellington seat covers in her car. She's a cutiehead. Ima pimp your site to her.
I *may* be wrong.
The same fairly-recent interview where I heard him talking about standing for Parliament, I'm sure he said that it wasn't a phase. He didn't seem sure what it was, but he answered no to a specific "Was it a phase?" question. He was saying that, having done a tour in man-clothes, he might go back to transvestite tours later.
I think it was Chain Reaction - a BBC radio comedy interview show - where he was discussing this.
He was saying that, having done a tour in man-clothes, he might go back to transvestite tours later.
Woot! Usually I'm totally unreasonable about the LA LA LA I'M WRITE SHUT UP-ness of things, but here I'm quite happy to smile and go, "See? Senile and wrong!"
Heh. Admittedly, I may be making this up. To put my mind at rest, I'm off to see if the clip is still anywhere online...