Aims, I was the deputy for my department of 12 people for a big-ass office move that involved more than 100 people. The main person was the building manager (who was awesome). My tips include: change makes people wig out, so you will do a lot of hand-holding; plan "getting rid of crap from your files" days well in advance - bring out the shredder and make it a party from 3-5 on a Friday; provide boxes and labels - one color label for each person or some scheme like that (we had numbers - every single person in the move had a number); make a plan for plants and fragile stuff - a holding area where they can be placed temporarily; have ONE person, preferably IT, move the computers and phones, and give VERY detailed instructions about how they should be left by the staff; communicate a LOT with your staff so they feel confident that you are on top of things and wig out less.
I don't know anything about getting new furniture, sorry.
Fortunately, we have the new furniture (mostly) taken care of - donations from the county. The rest we'll buy used.
I am printing out those posts and putting them in my move folder.
Thanks so much!!
Is it possible to do a floor plan of the new space and figure out which furniture will go where, so you know what you need, and you don't end up with credenzas in the hallway?
MSM is MainStream Media, right? Because I've done work tangentially related to HIV prevention, I always read it as Men who have Sex with Men.
Hence the claim that Al Gore has gotten rich(-er, actually) since his political days.
I was skimming too quickly, and read these together as some sort of "Al Gore has sex with men for money...FOR THE ENVIRONMENT" claim, and wow did my eyebrows go up.
But, y'know, if he does? And it works? (Or, heck, even if it doesn't work), go him!
Is it possible to do a floor plan of the new space and figure out which furniture will go where, so you know what you need, and you don't end up with credenzas in the hallway?
Yep. I'm getting my graph paper tomorrow!! WOOHOO!!
This is depressing: Shiller: House Prices Still Way Too High
Check out the graph. From another blog:
The "Shiller" part of the index comes from its co-producer Yale Professor Robert Shiller. He has an index of American home prices going back to 1890. According to this index, the housing bubble we just experienced was by orders of magnitude worse than any other we have ever seen in this country. Moreover (you better be sitting) housing prices have a lot further to drop, and I mean a LOT further, before returning to the trend line. He believes we are only halfway back to fair value and usually during a correction we overshoot fair value.
When Will Housing Bottom?
This headline sounds like something I might make up:
Scientists To Tape Magnets To Crocodiles To Confuse Them
(This link is to the HuffPost summary. The actual headline is less fun.)
This is depressing: Shiller: House Prices Still Way Too High
I'm suspect of a one variable index. House sizes have been increasing for one thing. That has to factor in as well. Not to say the bottom has been reached, but I don't know that national median is going fall as much as the chart shows.
Ya gotta love crazy math people....
Hilarious crypto-gibberish
Bruce Schneier's irregular "Doghouse" column features security companies making risible, redonkulous claims about their technology; the latest gang is from Singularics, who sound like unbalanced saucer-cultists who've spent too much time near the math department of their college:
Our advances in Prime Number Theory have led to a new branch of mathematics called Neutronics. Neutronic functions make possible for the first time the ability to analyze regions of mathematics commonly thought to be undefined, such as the point where one is divided by zero. In short, we have developed a new way to analyze the undefined point at the singularity which appears throughout higher mathematics.
This new analytic technique has given us profound insight into the way that prime numbers are distributed throughout the integers. According to RSA's website, there are over 1 billion licensed instances of RSA public-key encryption in use in the world today. Each of these instances of the prime number based RSA algorithm can now be deciphered using Neutronic analysis. Unlike RSA, Neutronic Encryption is not based on two large prime numbers but rather on the Neutronic forces that govern the distribution of the primes themselves. The encryption that results from Singularic's Neutronic public-key algorithm is theoretically impossible to break.
Um... no.
Plus, wtf is up with the name? Are they fans of Jimmy Neutron?
I've never coordinated an office move, but my department has moved twice since I've been here. I second Trudy's suggestion about numbering the rooms and all the stuff.
