Pete Wentz watched the inaugeration from a tree in furry boots!
'War Stories'
Natter 63: Life after PuppyCam
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
To be fair, while Graham (understandably, given his calling) seems to feel that Christian worship and prayer are the solution to every problem whether metaphysical or tangible, I don't recall him ever being accusatory or singling out any group of people for judgement. In fact, I quite clearly recall him counseling people that it was God's place to judge and not theirs. He was on TV quite a bit when I was growing up in the South, and I don't think I ever got the feeling that he was an enemy.
It was pretty obvious when all three couples bottlenecked before being announced and there was some standing and chatting. Clintons and Bushes were all huggy. Carters and Bushes shook hands. Clintons and Carters - no acknowledgment of each other.
Welcome back, Science!
He basically said that in his speech -- something like "Restore science to its rightful place," something something.
My stuffy lawfirm gathered in our great room. Most of the time we reined in our personal reactions -- but on that one there was audible glee.
He basically said that in his speech -- something like "Restore science to its rightful place," something something.
The speech in general was littered with stiletto jabs at the Bush administration, I thought - nicely done.
ABC is reporting Ted Kennedy collapsed at the lunch. :-(
And, again, let me apologize for writing the "j-word". I did not mean to offend, I simply wasn't thinking about how it would sound outside my head.
::snuggles quester::
Oh noes!
quester, thank you for the apology. I am sorry if you felt jumped on at all, and I know that you would not offend intentionally.
I can't cut and paste because I am on my phone, but I wanted to clarify my earlier statements. I was in no way saying that the prayer was not exclusionary, and I am so sorry for the people who felt excluded by it, and I was not saying that Jesus's name was not overused in the speech. It probably was, but Warren didn't hold my attention, so I really can't say. I was simply responding to what I was reading as a sentiment by some that Jesus should have been exclude from the invocation altogether.
The speech in general was littered with stiletto jabs at the Bush administration, I thought - nicely done.
I kept muttering "ooh SNAP" under my breath.