Today's xkcd: [link] The best part is, you can substitute SO MANY words/phrases for "sex" and it still works! (Like, say, "creating new threads"....)
Natter 63: Life after PuppyCam
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
AP Style: Apostrophe S after a single letter, e.g., "mind your p's and q's." No apostrophe for the rest, so it's IDSs. That looks very weird, but I checked and the patent office uses IDSs.
Thanks Ginger!
It's like a little piece of heaven with bagels and muffin tops.
If that's heaven then Tony Kushner was right about San Francisco.
t quite impolite and a bit selfish Um, is it OK to pop in Natter after skipping-and-skimming to the point of understanding how lurkers-support-stuff-in-e-mail, just in order to exploit the hivemind in English grammar question(s)?
t Not closing the quite-impolite and a-bit-selfish tag, since I'm still those things
It's totally fine!!
And of all the things you are Nilly, impolite and selfish are words that don't exist.
Nilly cannot be not fine.
I wish television news had to run a ticker with relevant facts under every speaker.
Oh, that's even better.
B/c it shouldn't be in Nilly's post - a co-worker just came up to me and basically said "you! do this now!"
1) FU
2) I don't work for you, and please or courtesy go a long way, FU.
3) When I do start letting you know what is what DO NOT F'in QUESTION ME ON MY ANSWERS YOU F'in MFer.
ps - if you had an ounce of intuitiveness you would know that I am about half a twitch away from cutting someone, now it's a good chance that soemone will be you.
Goodness, I miss posting with you guys so much!
But first, I'll exploit the hivemind: I get every spell-checker I use shout at me regarding sentences like these:
The deep and comprehensive description of that topology as well as its effect on the netwrok's properties makes it possible to blahblahblah
We showed that a dramatic improvement in the search's efficiency was achieved even for blahblahblah
Um, not because of the blahblahblah, of course (which transforms into actual, y'know, words, in the actual sentences), but because of the "'s". What's wrong with how I used it, and what's the proper way to write these sentences?
Ta, ever so!
[I'm confined lately to working from my computer at home, which is too old and weak to handle more than one window open at a time, and even then it sometimes needs coffee-breaks and naps - for itself, not for me, and not of the COMM kind, alas), so I can't open the b.org window as well as whatever I have to work on at the time. Goodness, I miss it so.]