Don't kill anyone if you don't have to. We're here to make a deal.

Mal ,'Serenity'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Amy - May 11, 2014 9:06:46 am PDT #29606 of 30002
Because books.

Just don't go back. They'll talk among themselves.


§ ita § - May 11, 2014 9:26:46 am PDT #29607 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Compulsion! And insults to me!


Amy - May 12, 2014 5:51:10 pm PDT #29608 of 30002
Because books.

I wonder if it's true that the network still wants an SPN spinoff: [link]


Amy - May 13, 2014 5:02:37 pm PDT #29609 of 30002
Because books.

God, I miss my show.

I think what I miss most is back roads and flannel and ordinary people with ordinary ghosts. I'm so tired of seeing Sam and Dean in suits, and Cas's "command center" was just absurd. And I couldn't give a shit about Metatron if my life depended on it.

Not that I won't watch next week, but man, do I hope S10 is an improvement.


Beverly - May 13, 2014 6:03:40 pm PDT #29610 of 30002
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.

Gee, your show that you miss is my show that I miss. Where'd that show go?


Amy - May 13, 2014 6:07:03 pm PDT #29611 of 30002
Because books.

I don't know.

And every time the Mark makes Dean growl, it's very watch-from-the-hall for me.

Swan Song was on the other day (TNT in the morning) and looking back, maybe it should have ended there. I liked a lot of seasons 6 and 7, and even a lot of 8, but overall, they don't add up to the same kind of story that seasons 1 through 5 did.


§ ita § - May 13, 2014 6:17:37 pm PDT #29612 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I shouldn't be here, because I haven't seen the ep yet, but I got into a debate with Charlie Jane. She loves the 1-5 story, and I realise I do not. I would have hated the ending, assuming Sam didn't come back, leaving PTSD alcoholic Dean in a house with a young child and a woman he barely knows--fine, Charlie's right, not everything has to be a hero's journey, but what does that ending do for me? Talk about rescinding rights to Carry On Wayward Son.

I also think 1-5 wasn't an awesome story. I like 1-3 and 3 or 4-5 better, but the Boy King and Lucifier's meatsuit stories never worked well together for me. Treating Kripke as an inviolable auteur (not here, IO9) also makes me laugh, because he tossed the special kids and the Roadhouse on a whim and broke his "no angels" promise (for the best--it's just to say the first five episodes didn't spring perfect from his anus)..

He was just a storyteller, feeling it out as he goes along, and I don't mind seasons that are individual arcs instead of there being a big 1-10 story, because I didn't feel the 1-5 story in the first place.

I much prefer this sort of storytelling to "Hannibal is going to keep making cannibals for five years, as he slowly destroys the lives of people around him" that has so many people enraptured, for instance. It might be pretty, but I have pictures I can look at for that.

Supernatural still excites me. It still makes me laugh. It still makes me sad. And some of that is because they're working with 8 years of canon, and I'm not ashamed one bit.

If they, IMO, ruin Sam or Dean before the tale's out (I'm 90% sure I can't survive the trashing of Baby), then I'm likely in hatewatching mode. I need to get off LCDs right now, but I'm still eager to see what happens tomorrow morning even as most of fandom sounds like they're ready to chuck it.


Amy - May 14, 2014 5:27:44 am PDT #29613 of 30002
Because books.

Kripke wasn't perfect -- no one is, author or not -- but for me seasons 1-5 work as a complete story. It doesn't have the happiest ending, but I'm okay with that. Not all stories have to end happily. And for me, those were the seasons that were really focused on Sam and Dean as a unit, as brothers, the heart of the show as it was conceived -- two brothers trying to get to the bottom of their mother's death and their family's horrible fate, and growing up in important ways in the process.

I liked a lot of elements from the subsequent seasons, don't get me wrong. But those are more individual moments or storylines. I never felt they did justice to the larger arcs -- Sam's soullessness could have been so much better if they had really dug into what a lack of a soul means (and even as messy as Joss was about it, his version was much more precise than SPN's). Dean's time in Purgatory amounted to not much, really, and Gadreel possessing Sam just wound up as more of the same betrayal blah blah blah.

I loved that scene in the church at the end of S8, and I was really eager to see what they did with fallen angels, and I just don't like the direction they took. The Sam and Dean of S9 don't seem like they could be the same men from that church scene, and the angel war is, for me, ridiculous and boring. Metatron wanted to cast all the angels out of heaven so ... he could eventually bring them back?

And Sam and Dean -- the ups and downs and back and forth is just tiresome now. By the time S5 ended, Dean had learned he had to let Sam grow up and decide his own fate, and Sam had come to terms with his resentment of John and grown into his role as an adult who could make choices on his own, and learn from them. Ever since then, it's seemed like one step forward, two steps back.


§ ita § - May 14, 2014 5:39:24 am PDT #29614 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Metatron wanted to cast all the angels out of heaven so ... he could eventually bring them back?

So he could lead them.

If my sister went to hell to save my life I'd flip my shit (and maybe start fucking Ruby). If she was dying and I could see any possible way to save her including feeding her chocolate...I'd still do it. I'm not mad at Dean for not learning to live alone. His terror is a very realistic and compelling theng for me.

1-5 falls apart when I prod at it. I would have probably ended up hating the season if it ended up with not just two ruined boys but an innocent about to be ruined family (I've been assuming Sam coming back was the addition--am I wrong? Would Dean have just been drunk driving across America instead? If he had just settled and dealt because Sam told him to, I'd have laughed my way out of fandom).

I like them stripped down to Team Free Will. I like the internal conflict being Dean batshit crazy. I like Dean telling Sam they're not even a team, much less a sibling unit. In fact, I don't actually want a season without conflict between the siblings.


Amy - May 14, 2014 6:00:03 am PDT #29615 of 30002
Because books.

Conflict between them is fine. Conflict that rehashes the same old beefs and goes nowhere is not satisfying TV for me.

I miss a show that was about two guys fighting monsters because they were saving people (and had been brought up that way), and also because they were looking for answers about their own family. I liked that story.

And I'm not hate-watching the show now--I love the Winchesters too much for that. I just miss what it used to be, and it all feels sort of bittersweet to me.