Elliot: I thought I said discreet. Gwen: What, do you see nipple?

'Just Rewards (2)'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


tiggy - Nov 02, 2012 4:29:39 am PDT #26791 of 30002
I do believe in killing the messenger, you know why? Because it sends a message. ~ Damon Salvatore

i'm just going to leave this here. [link]


§ ita § - Nov 02, 2012 4:57:52 am PDT #26792 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm more where Cass is. Saying what you've been told doesn't merit consideration.

To show how far off base I am with IO9, they called this the most homoerotic episode ever, because Sam was cast as jealous boyfriend, with Benny being usurping new lover.

Which...do I need to be more Wincesty to get that? I didn't think Sam was jealous, so much as confused and increasingly worried by Dean's continued vagueness, and it was a rational response to the things he let through.

Benny did not remotely strike me as a Sam replacement, despite his repeated use of the word "brother" and the title of the episode--he is a Cas replacement to me, and then not even.

Amelia is not a Dean substitute, because Sam's not romantically involved with Dean--he may have to choose between "indulging" in a romantic or fraternal bond, but that's not the same thing. Benny is not a Sam substitute--Sam is no longer battling a monster inside, and he's Dean's brother and will continue to be his brother in perpetuity. He might not always be the guy who fights beside him--but if he's going to get jealous about that, he can fix it by not quitting hunting--I did not get that read off it at all. Sam was mad because Dean was cagey, in peril, and then in cahoots with a monster. Not because there was homoeroticism (I actually see little to absolutely none Dean/Benny) or brother replacement. This isn't like the siren, and if Sam doesn't think Cas would replace him, why would Benny?


Amy - Nov 02, 2012 7:59:19 am PDT #26793 of 30002
Because books.

i'm just going to leave this here.

Nice point, tiggy.

ita, I think this episode was completely homoerotic, at least in terms of purgatory. She doesn't mean it literally with regard to Sam and Dean, but I think she's talking about how Dean tends to replace Sam with another man. Even Gordon, for a hot second way back when, you know? And then Cas and the siren.

I didn't see Sam as jealous, either, just concerned and confused. It's the secret-keeping that makes it so suspicious, just as Dean was suspicious when Sam was keeping secrets. I think it's just a partner thing, but it's cooler to label it honoeroticism.

The scene with Dean, Cas, and Benny was full of hoyay, though, if you ask me.


§ ita § - Nov 02, 2012 8:09:13 am PDT #26794 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think this episode was completely homoerotic, at least in terms of purgatory

Okay, I wrote and deleted a lot. Let's see if this stays.

What is the difference between just fighting at someone's side and fighting homoerotically at someone's side? Is there a difference? I believe there is.

What's the difference between fighting at someone's side when Sam's not there, and replacing Sam? Is there a difference? I believe there is.

I believe there is a homoerotic charge to how Dean interacts (but not how he fights alongside) with Cas. NSM Benny. I believe that Nick and very specific Cas moments (early S5 only) were Sam-replacement. Benny's not, Gordon wasn't. I mean, was Garth??? And was there hoyay there too?

I don't know when I became picky about hoyay, but the moment when Benny saved Cas was the moment Benny really became Dean's comrade and not just a guy who was helping him with a shared motive (because he accepts his priority, although he doesn't understand it) but I don't see a hoyay charge there.


Juliebird - Nov 02, 2012 8:21:41 am PDT #26795 of 30002
I am the fly who dreams of the spider

I thought Gordon was replacing John as a father figure?


§ ita § - Nov 02, 2012 9:02:00 am PDT #26796 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I thought Gordon was replacing John as a father figure?

If anything, yes. Dean seemed to be looking to him for approval, and a bit of camaraderie, but of the sort I bet he wished he could have had with his father, by earning his respect. Not the "in each others pockets" "finish each others sentences" sort of things that I would peg Sam-replacing as.

I don't model all of Dean's relationships as "like Sam" or "like sex" and the IO9 review seemed to be assuming there was just one template, because those two were the same.


§ ita § - Nov 02, 2012 10:23:00 am PDT #26797 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Here's a test to see if your feels need to go back to the shop (I typed ship...) for retuning: [link]


Cass - Nov 02, 2012 11:39:50 am PDT #26798 of 30002
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.

I am not watching the same show as IO9, clearly.

Also they need to proof their stories. Apparently when I disagree with someone, I am more likely to bitchily notice they used the wrong name occasionally.


Amy - Nov 02, 2012 11:40:43 am PDT #26799 of 30002
Because books.

I noticed that! They said Sam somewhere where they meant ... someone else I don't remember now, but not Sam.


Cass - Nov 02, 2012 11:47:56 am PDT #26800 of 30002
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.

They meant Dean. Unless Sam was in Purgatory and homoerotically fighting monsters.