Hair spoiler. Now that Eliot has lost his, Sam's is extra important to me, and this could be really good follicular replacement.
And I myself will be wearing pink taffeta as chenille would not go with my complexion.
Giles ,'Touched'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
§ ita § - Sep 22, 2012 5:38:00 pm PDT #26351 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Juliebird - Sep 22, 2012 5:55:09 pm PDT #26352 of 30002
I am the fly who dreams of the spider
Man, Elliot's hair loss has had me wishing Sam could do the same. Jared's hair never got the level of ridiculous that CK's did (I still think the braids -and possibly beads- beat out the dimple-infringing sideburns). I wonder, for purely academic reasons, what a season 1-type hairstyle would look on a 2012!Jared. Or even something middling.
Also, that sneak peak has me conflicted and angsty. My first reaction was "MEAN!". And I think that reaction is both from a meta pov and a narrative pov, but not a proper reaction for an unfolding story.
§ ita § - Sep 22, 2012 5:59:13 pm PDT #26353 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Good lord. I've never liked Sam's hair more. Get your traitorous self away from him.
I have a weird panic they'll fuck with the fangirls and give him a buzzcut before all is said and done (can you imagine hiding that spoiler???), but for now, I like it even more than before.
But then again, I'm on record as never having been mad at the beads either. Potentially cheesy rationale aside.
Amy - Sep 22, 2012 8:07:11 pm PDT #26354 of 30002
Because books.
The beads?
I think Jared totally carries off the hair, but Kane really didn't. Not as long as it was, and doing that flippy thing. Maybe it's the body proportions or the face shape, but I like Jared/Sam with long hair much more than Kane.
§ ita § - Sep 23, 2012 1:06:52 am PDT #26355 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Kane would wear a tiny braid with beads in it as a nod to his Native heritage. Never bothered me any, but a fair number of people thought it looked stupid.
Amy - Sep 23, 2012 6:06:04 am PDT #26356 of 30002
Because books.
I don't know if I ever noticed the beads. Huh.
§ ita § - Sep 23, 2012 7:00:22 am PDT #26357 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
It took me way too long to find even this crappy example: [link] . Zoom!
![[link]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m74pwagQh51r86u7so1_500.jpg){kind=link}
I can't work out why they aren't more prevalent.
Amy - Sep 23, 2012 7:02:37 am PDT #26358 of 30002
Because books.
Oh, yeah. Wow, I really do like his hair shorter. Those eyes, though. Mmm.
Beverly - Sep 23, 2012 10:08:46 am PDT #26359 of 30002
Days shrink and grow cold, sunlight through leaves is my song. Winter is long.
Where's Cass? This discussion is relevant to her interests.
Amy - Sep 23, 2012 2:44:37 pm PDT #26360 of 30002
Because books.
I don't know if she's caught up, to be honest. So she might not be reading in here?
Kane does make me think of her, though, it's true.