Not even remotely.
It's a damned shame, isn't it?
Never goes smooth. How come it never goes smooth?
Mal ,'Safe'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
§ ita § - Jul 22, 2012 10:33:20 am PDT #25967 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 22, 2012 12:43:18 pm PDT #25968 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
Well, almost never. Perhaps the reason is self-evident...
§ ita § - Jul 22, 2012 12:46:46 pm PDT #25969 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I thought that had been established as a 'shop job. No?
I don't really want to think about it. I am too delicate.
Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 22, 2012 12:51:37 pm PDT #25970 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
I've seen a photoshop-modified one, but I thought this was the less extreme original it was made from. Maybe two manip artists with different senses of what's believable worked on it in turn?
§ ita § - Jul 22, 2012 5:14:46 pm PDT #25971 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Man, I thought that summary said that Cas and Dean were in university together and Dean reads Cas' diary and then mans up--and starting the story it was clearly Cas in the asylum being watched by Meg. So I thought it was a Normal Again fic, with Cas as the ill person...and it just turns out I can't read, and it was just a small insert/deviation from canon.
But now I'm curious about the idea.
§ ita § - Jul 23, 2012 4:56:38 am PDT #25972 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Is this [link] a photo? When I zoom in, the detail on his neck looks, for instance, a bit real--what is paleonut so adamant about copyrighting--is it a frame from a video that she¹'s the only one that captured and coloured (image search only finds the version with her tag)?
![[link]](http://24.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m7liklGeDi1qiyteto1_1280.jpg){kind=link}
¹: fanperson gender shorthand
Amy - Jul 23, 2012 4:59:52 am PDT #25973 of 30002
Because books.
It looks to me like she colored it, or did something to it. What a strange picture to choose.
§ ita § - Jul 23, 2012 5:03:08 am PDT #25974 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I think it's hysterical, but if she didn't take the picture, or paint over it--what does copyrighting filters on a screen grab on someone else's footage even supposed to mean? There's transformative, and then there's work.
And, yeah, that last sentence doesn't actually mean anything.
Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 23, 2012 6:08:15 am PDT #25975 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
I suppose there are painters that could do that realistic a job on skin texture, given weeks to work on the image. But in my experience, almost no one would think to do hair in different levels of focus to convey motion blur - the whipping strands would be as sharp as the still ones.
§ ita § - Jul 23, 2012 6:22:03 am PDT #25976 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Maybe she took the picture. It looks like the Nerd HQ. I'll give her the benefit of the doubt since I haven't seen the full "official" footage.