You're making me look things up.

The D/C circus AU that I'm in the middle of has some brilliant mapping of canon.

Well, Thursday's Child has far to go*. I've always thought that had a lot to do with him being the angel of Thursday, and Castiel's journey of self-discovery.

*Monday's Child is fair of face
Tuesday's Child is full of grace
Wednesday's Child is full of woe (thus, Wednesday Addams)
Thursday's Child has far to go
Friday's Child is loving and giving
Saturday's Child has to work for its living
But the Child that's born on the Sabbath Day is bonny and blithe and good and gay.

Take that last as you will.

I was born on Sunday, which blasts the hell out of that theory.

Eh. Some of us think you're pretty bonny and blithe, even if it's a sort of bitteresque bonny and blithe.

Wow. I'm looking at Daggomus Prime's illos for the D/C circus AU, and...I don't like it. I really don't like it. I've never disliked any of her stuff strongly, but her attempt at a more painterly style for these fanarts seem to have lost much of what I liked of her stuff (such strong shapes, such great lines), and it doesn't feel to me like she's mastered the principles. The painting looks awkward, not harmonious.

And when I looked at the first figure on her banner piece, the question went through my mind--"Why is that man dressed like a ballerina?"

I'm out of the fanart loop these days, so I don't know if there's be a progression that ended her up here, or what. But I am disappointed. She's usually such an easy win for me--she's where I first got into the groove of fanart Winchesters not looking like Jensen and Jared, since she put so much character in that it was still Dean and Sam.

Not getting that vibe here.

[link]

I hope the story is good, though.

When I first saw the art, I thought it was Dean in drag. Which, given part of the story, wasn't farfetched.

That's one point of the story that I'm hung up on, due to the vagueries.

So Dean got involved in a freak show that involved sex acts. Was he forced to sodomize other performers, or was he the one sodomized. It's hard to tell at the end (and I totally didn't get the Hershey reference until someone asked a question about it in the author's notes) and I'm not sure if it matters which.

But, my god did I hate Ruby to a violent death and was sad that that didn't actually happen.

But otherwise I was delighted at the fresh take on the way bits of canon were mapped into this 'verse. A little shaken, a little stirred. And I amazingly didn't hate Gabriel.

I found the story lacking in emotion (except for hatred--when she went season 4, she went very season 4--I'm picky about my season 4, and this wasn't it). It was a nice time spent in Dean's head, but Dean lacks so much perspective, and she didn't really cast all that much light...If you're going to be that deeply in someone's PoV, there has to still be some way to translate for Deanish, but I felt like she just left out the things that Dean didn't get. And then, was totally vague about things Dean did know.

I don't feel curious about that, all told. I just feel manipulated. The clues she left were too opaque for me.

I guess that first picture could be Dean in drag, having read the story, but that's not even good. The face is mannish, but those aren't the same person's arms on both sides of that poster.

All in all the entire package wasn't my thing.

Oh, and about the way Dean save Sam--you can kill a *liger* with knives described as small as those? I wasn't feeling that either.

Castiel season 4 is ridic hot.

Season 5 he got goofy and Misha also started nesting or something. I'm always taken aback and left breathless when I see him in a season 4 ep.

Misha nesting? I'm not sure what that means.