There's a voracious batch of Rachel/Quinn shippers (or Faberry, because smush names never really leave us, they just get reimagined), and there was some rumor that they were also using bots.
t /checking in from slightly deeper in Glee fandom
If every vampire who said he was at the crucifixion was actually there, it would have been like Woodstock.
Spike ,'Same Time, Same Place'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Ailleann - Feb 15, 2012 6:25:40 am PST #24176 of 30002
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2012 6:45:35 am PST #24177 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The voting for this final round was vetted as totally clean on the Faberry side, and they won by a bigger margin that they ever had in the first final round, so I wouldn't doubt Destiel was using bots at some point too.
Ailleann - Feb 15, 2012 6:50:59 am PST #24178 of 30002
vanguard of the socialist Hollywood liberal homosexualist agenda
Fandom: so often the reason we can't have nice things.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2012 12:02:53 pm PST #24179 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Shirt's first outing: [link]
Theresa - Feb 15, 2012 12:32:13 pm PST #24180 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"
Fandom: so often the reason we can't have nice things.
Heh.
Shirt's first outing:
Pretty and badass all at the same time!
Amy - Feb 15, 2012 2:15:40 pm PST #24181 of 30002
Because books.
Nice shirt! I like the cap, too.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2012 3:30:34 pm PST #24182 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Why thank you, thank you very much.
A fic just *almost* said Sam's puppy dog eyes grow up and become his bitch faces, and now I'm distracted by how stupidly stupidly funny I'd have found that.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2012 3:57:40 pm PST #24183 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Okay, said author has made me mad.
Sam's fiancée is named Sarah, and it doesn't seem to be that Sarah. Why would you do that, except for not paying attention to history?
I found an early fic to see if they'd explain if it's her (no, it definitely seems to be someone new), and it contains this:
They drink wine after dinner, a strange change from their normal hard liquor and countless beers. No one complains - not even Bobby. Both Sam and Bobby seem to be making an effort towards self-betterment for their ladies' sake.
And I just...I can't. It feels like you're being judgy judgy on the whole show, and saying that Bobby is stopping drinking for Jodi--well, she wanted to drink the whiskey from Rufus too. Stop putting all that on the "girl" in the relationship, just like you're putting it on Cas as Dean stops drinking so much for him too.
It's just...it weirds me out.
Amy - Feb 15, 2012 4:09:53 pm PST #24184 of 30002
Because books.
I know an alcoholic who drank nothing but wine. It's a completely pointless distinction, and sexist on top of it.
Bob Singer's intro to this week's episode.
§ ita § - Feb 15, 2012 4:30:09 pm PST #24185 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
My reaction to that intro is: Baby, no! God, you Winchesters kill me.
I get the impression the author thinks she's both neutering and classing up Sam and Dean, with all the stupid narrow-minded assumptions that entails.
I feel like that's pretty much throwing the baby out with the bathwater...well, not exactly, but, well, they are totally watching the show wrong. So there.