I'd love to take it off the table, since I'm pretty traumatised by most Olympic sports when played naked.
River: I didn't think you'd come for me. Simon: Well, you're a dummy.
'Serenity'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
§ ita § - Feb 03, 2012 10:58:25 am PST #23923 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Amy - Feb 03, 2012 11:08:48 am PST #23924 of 30002
Because books.
Military would be awesome. Wow, it's hard to think of other things they haven't already done. I'm not as interested in uniformed cops, and they were firefighters once.
Chef? That would be pretty funny.
§ ita § - Feb 03, 2012 11:52:48 am PST #23925 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
So, the tumblr response to this producer's review (Singer, not Gamble) is negative, but I guess I already knew the final reveal (happens right after the sneak peek linked to above) of the premise, so I'm not mad at it.
I feel weirdly like I should, but I don't. Maybe it's because I'm so strenuously psyched for them to flesh out that middle bit.
Amy - Feb 03, 2012 11:59:53 am PST #23926 of 30002
Because books.
Wait, what's not to like? I mean, we knew from the teaser last week that she was going to get pregnant, right?
§ ita § - Feb 03, 2012 12:03:28 pm PST #23927 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Seriously. It seemed like the obvious turn of events.
Maybe it's too close to the sacred? I'd be really startled if it has any long term impact on the plot or the characters--maybe that's it? It should?
Amy - Feb 03, 2012 12:50:01 pm PST #23928 of 30002
Because books.
Sadly, with parts of this fandom, it could be as simple as Dean kissing a girl. Some folks seem to really loathe that, no matter who it is.
Or is that what you meant by the sacred?
§ ita § - Feb 03, 2012 1:01:21 pm PST #23929 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Well, there is that, but I was wondering if the idea of Winchester spawn had to be handled with religious respect. Then again, the Doctor Who fandom freaked out when there was an episode called The Doctor's Daughter and it was a decent episode that didn't ruin our hero(es).
Amy - Feb 03, 2012 1:24:36 pm PST #23930 of 30002
Because books.
I guess I assumed that was covered with Ben (Glory?), but maybe not.
Although I guess it will be a bit awkward if he has progeny he then has to kill . Oops?
Also, ONLY TWO AND A HALF HOURS NOW!
::Kermit arms::
§ ita § - Feb 03, 2012 1:25:35 pm PST #23931 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I assume that progeny will need to die, or will somehow disappear. I would be *totally* surprised if there's a long-term effect from that.
However, I don't mind being surprised.
Amy - Feb 03, 2012 3:43:06 pm PST #23932 of 30002
Because books.
A fellow fan.
@ToddBridges
@CW_Supernatural it better be good mr jim m your my bud but im still mad about bobby
(Yes, that Todd Bridges.)