OMG, I am so close to loving this, but why would they write that under Gabe? Makes NO SENSE. My finger hovers over the favourite button...
Still, the execution is awesome.
Very convincing. Makes me completely want to put myself under government control. Please take me to where you can make me unconscious and naked.
Riley ,'Help'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
§ ita § - May 03, 2011 5:35:01 pm PDT #19542 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Amy - May 03, 2011 5:39:41 pm PDT #19543 of 30002
Because books.
Is that supposed to be Enochian under some of them?
I don't know -- I can see them understanding him a lot better after his last two appearances, and sort of retroactively appreciating his angst and his sense of humor. I don't think Dean ever held as much against him as Sam did, and Sam could be sort of Stockholmed into gratitude that he gave Dean *back* in the end.
I'm mostly trying to convince myself how it could work without any icky slashy vibe.
§ ita § - May 03, 2011 5:52:54 pm PDT #19544 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Actively miss him, though? Want his strength in battle, be sad he died in their fight, I get. Miss his company? HE KILLED DEAN 100 TIMES. I don't think they're necessarily at the point of sharing beer.
Not without work.
Sorry, I randomly read a fic where Gabe appears to Sam to share his bed every night platonically and eventually they get together, so I'm having some major Gabe disconnect right now.
Just because *we* like him, you know?
Amy - May 03, 2011 5:54:34 pm PDT #19545 of 30002
Because books.
I can't see actively missing him, but missing the idea of him? As you said, sad he died in their fight?
I could get behind, like, Gabriel and Chuck maybe. But Gabriel and either brother? NO.
§ ita § - May 03, 2011 6:42:29 pm PDT #19546 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'm trying to imagine Dean pencilling in anywhere that he misses Castiel. Might as well doodle Mrs. Dean AngelOfGod in the margins of John's journal.
Suffer that missing on the inside, boyos!
§ ita § - May 03, 2011 7:21:21 pm PDT #19547 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I give up! The schmoop has killed me. I can never schmoop again. Why schmoop? It's been schmooped. CDL took the D/C, and she uberschmooped it.
§ ita § - May 04, 2011 5:21:26 am PDT #19548 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Triple posting! Grr.
Breakdown for the BB is up:
Sam/Dean: 59
Dean/Castiel: 13
SPN Het: 4
SPN Gen: 22
SPN Femslash: 2
Other SPN Pairings: 17
Jared/Jensen: 116
RPS Gen: 3
Other RPS pairings: 8
That is a LOT of J2. Hells bells. And more gen than D/C? ::sniff:: I'm so spoilt. I could be primarily a femmeslasher. That would suck.
Matt the Bruins fan - May 04, 2011 5:48:45 am PDT #19549 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
I think the femmeslashers tend to pick fandoms where there are female characters to slash. Have two named women besides Ellen and Jo ever appeared onscreen simultaneously?
Amy - May 04, 2011 5:52:04 am PDT #19550 of 30002
Because books.
Is that the main Big Bang, ita?
Have two named women besides Ellen and Jo ever appeared onscreen simultaneously?
Anna and Ruby. Anna and Pamela.
§ ita § - May 04, 2011 7:04:22 am PDT #19551 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
The show even manages to pass the Bechdel test from episode to episode, if you stop and think about it.
Mary and Deanna also share screen time, as well as Ruby and Lilith, to some degree.
Yes, it's the main bang, Amy. It seems smaller than last year. Don't know if there's bang overload or what.