Can't you ever get your mind out of the hellmouth?

Buffy ,'Touched'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Juliebird - Mar 19, 2011 1:49:25 pm PDT #18546 of 30002
I am the fly who dreams of the spider

Hi, I'm Julie, and . . . I've read graphic Wincest.

::clapping::

I was thinking at first "perspective" based on what we like or what we have or haven't read. I was thinking that because of my having been exposed to S/D slash maybe I was viewing it biased. But, the closeups! The emphasis on lip-licking and glances and touching! The tomfoolery doesn't happen until the final 45 seconds or so, and it's not until then that I sense anything brotherly. Even the hugs are staged as these epic erotic things.


§ ita § - Mar 19, 2011 1:55:09 pm PDT #18547 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I was wondering if it was because I had a Wincest squick that I was seeing it, but then I figured maybe she's just trying to get it past a jaded audience, one that doesn't really care because they've seen explicit manips et al.

But does being an S/D shipper make you more sensitive to seeing that sort of stuff because you're hungry for it? Being squicked for it means that your antennae are up?

Dunno. But vidder still put them in on purpose.


Amy - Mar 19, 2011 2:08:30 pm PDT #18548 of 30002
Because books.

In completely other news, Annette O'Toole just tweeted this (and SuperWiki retweeted it):

...Sat next to Jensen Ackles on plane home. Reminiscing w/him was SO comforting. What a lovely person he is.

I removed what might have been a spoiler from the beginning. I don't follow Smallville, though, so I have no idea if it was actually spoilery or not.


Anne W. - Mar 19, 2011 3:02:01 pm PDT #18549 of 30002
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.

Aw, that's sweet, Amy.

I have a very specific definition for it in my head, and it's probably not a usefully shared one. It's usually when one or both of the pair doesn't understand what they're feeling is non-platonic, and nothing is acted upon, although personal space may be invaded and possessiveness might be demonstrated.

Hee. That's pretty much how I define 'pre-slash' in my own mind. The feelings are there, but the understanding of/action on those feelings is not. I see it as being different from something that's laden with subtext, because in pre-slash (as opposed to gen), the text is more dom than sub.


§ ita § - Mar 19, 2011 3:10:43 pm PDT #18550 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I've seen people complain that it's not fair to have a term pre-slash and no het equivalent, and that that means pre-slash is homophobic or homo-fetishising or something, but seriously, I'd just want a het equivalent. Because if I'm reading for gen and I get the pre-cooties, ickie poo. Also, if I'm looking for shippy teasing, I want to know the distinction between that and a fic that has definite shippy payoff.


§ ita § - Mar 19, 2011 7:29:28 pm PDT #18551 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think my sister owes me an hour of SPN.

She's predisposed to hate it, because I like it so much. She's crazy intelligent, tends to like British drama, Korean action, South American soaps. She likes sexual tension, but has my incest squick. She likes a good action rescue, but gets grossed out when things are too graphic. She has no interest in the guy getting the girl in the end.

WHAT EPISODE? Just one ep, continuity be damned. I think I may have sat her through most of Changing Channels already, so it would have to be something else.


Amy - Mar 19, 2011 7:42:49 pm PDT #18552 of 30002
Because books.

Folsom Prison Blues. Good brotherly teamwork, daring scheme, some humor, decent source of backstory, nice touch of melodrama wrt John's legacy.

The jumpsuits are a plausible drawback.


§ ita § - Mar 19, 2011 7:47:29 pm PDT #18553 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Interesting choice. I'd not have come to that on my own. I don't think of it as a standout, although it's a favourite of the season.

Speaking of new people watching the show, bon is PISSED at Croatoan. She thinks they shouldn't have killed the mother. It wasn't clear that she was infected, bon said, and that it would have been better to send her outside if she presented a potential threat.

I cannot talk her down from this. It's how she views the episode, the one where they murder the woman. Not, the one where Dean gives up for the first time, like we all know it is. I can't fix her.


Amy - Mar 19, 2011 7:52:35 pm PDT #18554 of 30002
Because books.

S. said Faith for themes, brothers working together, good stand-alone. Doesn't quite work for me, but I'm not sure why.

How do you send the mom outside if she's a threat? The whole point of killing her is because she is a threat if she's infected. God, Croatoan is so much more than that.


§ ita § - Mar 19, 2011 7:58:32 pm PDT #18555 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Because if she's infected then she meets up with other infected people outside and do we know infected is all that bad if they don't have an angle to try and kill you right there?

I have no idea how come she came down all Crote rights, but I try and talk her out of it every time.

Eliminate the threat before much damage is done. It's what the boys do. Exploring alternate means of existence for the slavering murderers is above their pay grade. Even Sammy's.