Oh wait, I'm mixing things up again. Gaiman didn't write the Constantine vs. vampires issue.
'Safe'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
I've heard it's not politic to say so, but since I didn't read the comic, I loved Keanu as Constantine. I also don't care for Sting outside of his looks, though, so there's that.
Amy, take my word for it. You're unexposed.
The character doesn't have anything to do with Sting outside of his looks, as far as I know anything of Mr. Sumner. He's irretrievably bitter and wry and funny and scarred in a way that...well, maybe Keanu pulled it off in the second half of the movie, but I sure didn't see it before I crapped out.
The movie wasn't a bad movie. It just wasn't John Constantine.
It's one of the comics I'd like to pick up. The list is getting longer.
The movie wasn't a bad movie. It just wasn't John Constantine.
Yep. Hell, we own it! I think it's a fun paranormal/urban fantasy movie. With a main character who happens to have the same name as a character from a comic I like.
Yep. Hell, we own it! I think it's a fun paranormal/urban fantasy movie. With a main character who happens to have the same name as a character from a comic I like.
This.
Been meaning to ask this for awhile: is there some canon evidence that Dean DOES NOT CUDDLE? Or is that like Sam's Bitchface #6?
I'm not a fan of season 3, although there are some individual episodes I liked. S1-2 and S4-5 were both great. And, yes, some things changed between them. But characters have experiences, grow, discover new paths, get an angelic stalker boyfriend friend, and stuff changes. Unless you're in a Blondie cartoon, I guess. The journey's part of the fun of watching.
Does lack of counter-evidence count as evidence?