I got stupid. The money was too good.

Jayne ,'Objects In Space'


Natter 62: The 62nd Natter  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Shir - Jan 07, 2009 2:42:44 am PST #9670 of 10002
"And that's why God Almighty gave us fire insurance and the public defender".

And just in time for Miracleman's birthday (x-posted with Bitches):

Israel says it's willing to discuss with Hamas on the base of the Egyptian truce suggestion!


amych - Jan 07, 2009 2:46:44 am PST #9671 of 10002
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Happy birthday, MM!


Barb - Jan 07, 2009 2:47:09 am PST #9672 of 10002
“Not dead yet!”

Dude... so that's why he hasn't been working on that transporter.

He's been brokering world peace. Or else slipping roofies into the drinks of high ranking officials.


Jesse - Jan 07, 2009 2:54:20 am PST #9673 of 10002
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

HBD, MM!


Sue - Jan 07, 2009 2:58:24 am PST #9674 of 10002
hip deep in pie

I got 14 on that logic test, but it didn't tell me what one I got wrong, and I can't figure it out.

Happy Birthday Miraclman!


DebetEsse - Jan 07, 2009 3:26:36 am PST #9675 of 10002
Woe to the fucking wicked.

Many happy returns of the day, MM!

I think, on 15 the "we can predict" clause makes it hinkier. That should have been left out.


amych - Jan 07, 2009 3:44:34 am PST #9676 of 10002
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Contra Debet, the "we can predict" clause can't be left out, because that's exactly the point of the thing -- the logical statement isn't about whether water is or isn't H2O, but about whether the preceding statements imply anything about what is or isn't *predictable*. It isn't hedge-language at all.


DebetEsse - Jan 07, 2009 3:50:24 am PST #9677 of 10002
Woe to the fucking wicked.

Amych, would "we should be able to predict" work as well for you? Because that works better for me.


Jessica - Jan 07, 2009 3:50:34 am PST #9678 of 10002
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

I really don't like 15. It's sneaky. (Billytea's reasoning makes much more sense to me than the one given by the quiz.)


Jessica - Jan 07, 2009 3:52:19 am PST #9679 of 10002
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?

Okay, but if the hypothetical future observation of "water" reveals a different chemical composition, then it's not water (as per premise #1), and doesn't apply to the problem.