he does represent a large chunk of the populace.
This may annoy some folks.
Warren represents a lot of people. In reading other sites, several evangelical types were gobsmacked that Obama was having him at the Inaugeration and they actually paused to re-think they're gut reaction to Obama.
Tomorrow he's being inaugerated as President of the United States, not President of the People who Voted for Me and, Oh Yeah, Those Other People, too. So it's time he starts acting like it.
I'm sorry it hurts you that Warren is there. But we can't continue the policies of rewarding only the people who agree with us. There's a huge gulf between the two ideological sections of this country, and the bridge isn't going to be built if we ignore the building materials that can reach the other side.
We can't change them if we don't talk to them, and we can't talk to them if we shun them.
Also, while the idea of Satanism being the antithesis of Christianity is there, atheism is more prevalent, and as such I think taken more seriously.
This is true. What you're saying makes sense. And I'm sorry this has happened to you.
In fact, now might be a good time for me to apologize in general on behalf of Christians. I'm sorry, world!
On the other religion topic, I was wondering if there was someone you guys saw who would have been a better choice to give the invocation, who would have still appealed to the across the aisle demographic Obama's trying to reach out to? I know you're not supposed to be the experts on pastors in a religion you don't subscribe to. But if it helps for perspective at all, I had heard lots of what Rick Warren had to say about lots of topics, and I hadn't heard the views that were problematic until they came up here. So if it helps any, that particular message has not (IME) been a huge part of his overall preaching.
Like others, I want to make it clear I'm not supporting what he said at all, and I voted against the AZ equivalent of Prop 8. Just that as far as hatemongering goes, I hadn't been exposed to it from him, as part of his target demographic.
Anyway! Since I'm breaking my rule about not talking about religion and politics online, I might as well go ahead and say I'm so excited about the inauguration! Well, I'm more basically still hopeful about the administration. But I'm ready for it to be on, and for us to be done with Bushes.
Yeah, echoing hatred of the song "Daughters" -- just awful.
On the other religion topic, I was wondering if there was someone you guys saw who would have been a better choice to give the invocation, who would have still appealed to the across the aisle demographic Obama's trying to reach out to? I know you're not supposed to be the experts on pastors in a religion you don't subscribe to. But if it helps for perspective at all, I had heard lots of what Rick Warren had to say about lots of topics, and I hadn't heard the views that were problematic until they came up here. So if it helps any, that particular message has not (IME) been a huge part of his overall preaching.
I can't think of one. Warren, I feel, is possibly teachable. The rest, not so much.
In reading other sites, several evangelical types were gobsmacked that Obama was having him at the Inaugeration and they actually paused to re-think they're gut reaction to Obama.
The choice still hurts, but I do believe that Obama is a big picture guy and he does want to make real change. There are so many things on his plate to accomplish and he won't be able to do it without cooperation from Those Other Not Us people. I feel hope for the first time in so long. It is a beautiful thing.
I'm sorry it hurts you that Warren is there. But we can't continue the policies of rewarding only the people who agree with us.
Political disagreement is different than hate speech. There are plenty of people on the political right who have not publically equated homosexuality with bestiality and abortion rights to the Holocaust. And it does a disservice to the many sane conservatives out there to imply that reaching across the aisle means bypassing them entirely in favor of the radical fringe.
Well, I wish he'd picked an ordinary pastor, not Right-Wing Rockstar Gay-hater Guy.
There's accomodating and there's being a sucker.
Like I can't imagine McCain winning and inviting a Wiccan moon-priestess for our benefit.
That's my question, though -- is he the radical fringe (and, therefore, not representative of a large chunk of people)? And who would be a better choice for that side of the aisle?
(Actual questions, not rhetorical. I'm asking, not making a point.)
Like I can't imagine McCain winning and inviting a Wiccan moon-priestess for our benefit.
Yeah, but McCain was running on the hope of vast untapped reserves on the far right. So his whole pitch was "yucky lefties -- don't we hate 'em?"
