why am I googling ex-boyfriends?
Wash: Little River just gets more colorful by the moment. What'll she do next? Zoe: Either blow us all up or rub soup in our hair. It's a toss-up. Wash: I hope she does the soup thing. It's always a hoot, and we don't all die from it.
'Objects In Space'
Natter 61*
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
msbelle - Oct 08, 2008 5:53:07 pm PDT #3517 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
quester - Oct 08, 2008 5:54:48 pm PDT #3518 of 10001
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.
really bored?
Kat - Oct 08, 2008 5:55:28 pm PDT #3519 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
oh yeah. I went back last saturday at 4:00 AM. I had just a random virus.
Amazingly funny reviews of bic pens. including my fave:
Worked fine with my right hand, but when I came to use my left hand my writing came out looking like the work of a complete imbecile. I can only assume Bic have created a right-handed only pen, and would caution left-handers to "try before you buy".
§ ita § - Oct 08, 2008 6:00:44 pm PDT #3520 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I never got why Jo married Professor Bhaer instead of Laurie. Or I never understood why Amy took her sister's castoffs.
Pizza worked out a little too crisp, but otherwise great. Grilled chicken and mushrooms--mmmm.
Kat - Oct 08, 2008 6:05:31 pm PDT #3521 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo
I want pizza.
Scrappy - Oct 08, 2008 6:10:34 pm PDT #3522 of 10001
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.
Bhaer was warm and smart and liked Jo as she was. Laurie was whiny and girly. (At least in the 1937 film version) He was better in the book, but I didn't like him much there, either.
§ ita § - Oct 08, 2008 6:16:06 pm PDT #3523 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I'm watching the 1933 version and the Professor creeps me out. He's all piny and all. They haven't shown Laurie disliking Jo as she is--they've shown them having a high-spirited old time, and I guess that's what appeals to me.
Amy - Oct 08, 2008 6:23:04 pm PDT #3524 of 10001
Because books.
I'm referencing the book, not the 1933 movie, but I think Jo knew she loved Laurie as a brother, and also knew she wasn't ready to be partnered yet. Laurie had a lot of growing up to do, still.
I think by the time he and Amy met again in Europe, he had done that, but so had she. The way two old friends look at each other with new eyes in those chapters always got to me.
Apparently, I can rhapsodize over Little Women at the drop of a hat.
§ ita § - Oct 08, 2008 6:28:07 pm PDT #3525 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I guess when I read the book I was young I didn't get the distinction between the sorts of love and I didn't see anything in old man Bhaer.
The movie doesn't cover the change of heart one bit.
quester - Oct 08, 2008 6:28:52 pm PDT #3526 of 10001
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.
Wasn't the professor played by Gabriel Byrne in the most recent version? I'd pick him over anyone, anyday (except James Morrison),