Speaking of Palin, one of my favorite post debate lines was watching Anderson Cooper on CNN. Someone, I think Blitzer, mentioned trying to get Palin for comment and Anderson said, "Don't hold your breath on that one."

Some more comments. There are a couple of paths out of this. If the Congress granted 32 billion under the current bailout terms, with a new session the 14th and a committment that the session would not end until something was passed that probably would probably calm the credit markets enough to get through to the 14th. If not the alternative is to forget about trying to get the Republicans on Board. The bailout lost 94 Democrats because there were too many concessions to Republicans. Do a Swedish style bailout - no purchase of assets straight equity investment (preferred stock, with a modification to financial laws that it was super-duper preferred stock preferred over bondholders, not just other stockholders.) Add a Roosevelt option - Nationalize the Federal reserve, make a Bank of the United States (or if that name is taken, something similar) that can lend to small businesses and provide other types of vital short term credit. I suspect that would unfreeze credit in banks that were not taken over. You could add conditions, something more concrete than is in the current bill to keep people in their homes, real limits on executive concessions. You could also add a quarter percent tax on financial and currency transactions to pay for the costs of the bailout, and. Since deregulation, and lack of new regulation got us into this mess, I'd include limits on leverage and require that all new types of financial instruments require approval before they become legal. I'd add that a special session be called in January (if neccesary taking time from the regular session ) to pass new more comprehnsive regulation and changes - the legislation to be fast tracked, not completely (amendments would be allowed) but not subject to filibuster, and with not only debate but Amendendments and other parliamentary manuevers for delays limited.

Frankly, I'd follow historical precedent of using emergencies to extract progressive concessions (how democracy evolved in England for example) and say New Deal or No Deal, and add a bunch of stuff like green investment, and National Health. But I don't think you could get Democratic support for that, so I'll stick to what I already mentioned, which I think you could get a Democratic majority for.

Like on the immigration bill, the opposition did not fear their party but their voters.

Simple -- elections are coming up.

That dick Boehner is blaming the failure to pass on Pelosi, even though HIS OWN PARTY voted no 2-1.

I don't think Boehner knows what 'partisan' means in real world speak.

Dow dropped the most-ever points -- worse than after 9/11. Heckuva job, Bushie.

Ok, I'm officially not sorry anymore for the grief he got in school for a name that looks like "Boner"

That dick Boehner is blaming the failure to pass on Pelosi, even though HIS OWN PARTY voted no 2-1.

Yeah. Pelosi was rude and the Republicans' feelings were hurt, so they punished America.

At least that's what Wonkette said...

Hmmm, sadly, I just realized I have no idea who my Congressman/woman is.

My Congressman is a Lieberdem called Baird. As I said the Democrats should say screw getting Republicans on board. Get something every or almost every Democrat can pass. This process is fast tracked, so it does not take 60 votes to pass in the Senate. Simple majorities will do. I said what I favored, but even if the Democrats won't go for that surely they can scrawl something on a napkin better than what Paulson scrawled on a napkin.

Hmmm, sadly, I just realized I have no idea who my Congressman/woman is.

Enter your address to get your congressional district (or your city or state to get all the congresscritters for that city or state): [link]

congresscritters

Hee!