Laura I read that amendment and I have no idea what it means, I need to look it up.
'Conviction (1)'
Spike's Bitches 42: Which question do you want me to answer first?
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Laura I read that amendment and I have no idea what it means, I need to look it up.
I need to read over it again, too. Actually, there are a couple things on the ballot I need to make sure of before I vote.
I really didn't like the way Amendment 2 was worded, it was so baised for the amendment being passed. And I got an email (with my grandmother's name) from Liberty Council urging me to vote for the Amendment and fight Anti Family groups trying to destroy marriage.
I sent them a form back (I found a place to do that) saying I didn't know how they got my email address but I consider Amendment 2 to be anti family.
As least LOL Cat customer service wouldn't try to upsell you after they haven't helped you.
Oh, I *hate* that.
Dear coworker: I know you have a family and often can't get to work at your scheduled time but I'm tired of your saying you'll be x minutes late and arrving 2x minutes late.
The Palm Beach Post had a good explanation on Amendment 1:
Acting out of fear of the "Yellow Peril," Florida amended the state constitution in 1926 to ban "aliens ineligible for citizenship" from owning land. The "Yellow Peril" fear of Asian immigration has been replaced by fears of illegal Hispanic immigration, but the ban remains.
It shouldn't. Such outdated xenophobia has been removed from state constitutions nationwide - most recently in New Mexico and Wyoming - leaving Florida as the last state with a constitutional throwback to racist "Jim Crow" laws. Amendment 1 on the Nov. 4 ballot would remove the ban. Passage requires support from 60 percent of voters. The Legislature voted to hold the referendum in the closing moments of the 2007 session at the urging of state Sen. Steve Geller, D-Hallandale Beach.
Even though the ban never had been applied, passage did not come without a fight. Rep. Mitch Needelman, R-Melbourne, argued that it would be nice to keep it around as an immigration-fighting tool. Thirty House members agreed with Rep. Needelman. Voters can tell them how wrong they were by erasing this stain from a racist past.
Hard to get all that from the wording of the actual amendment.
Oy, it's so unbelievably headache inducing, the legalese.
not sure who to cheer for in the World Series. I've got no pony in that race. Maybe TB since my sister lives in FLA.
I live in Florida, but Go Phillies!
[link] What might be the cutest kitten in the history of ever.