The next time you decide to stab me in the back... have the guts to do it to my face.

Mal ,'Ariel'


Natter 60: Gone In 60 Seconds  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Frankenbuddha - Sep 09, 2008 6:04:52 am PDT #7898 of 10003
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"

Authorities say they've arrested a man who broke into the home of two California farmworkers, stole money, rubbed one with spices and whacked the other with a sausage before fleeing.

It sounds like Tony Bourdain saw Rachel Ray once too often and he snapped.


Barb - Sep 09, 2008 6:08:24 am PDT #7899 of 10003
“Not dead yet!”

A perfectly hysterical dance review.


juliana - Sep 09, 2008 6:20:34 am PDT #7900 of 10003
I’d be lying if I didn’t say that I miss them all tonight…

HAPPY BIRTHDAY, NUTTY!!

May all cheetahs and squash courts flee from you in terror.


Steph L. - Sep 09, 2008 6:30:48 am PDT #7901 of 10003
I look more rad than Lutheranism

That link doesn't show anything, Dana.

It did for me -- maybe I got in before the store was put in stasis pre-Steve Jobs speech.

And thanks, amych and Dana (and Jess for the confirmation of the ear-friendliness of the Apple buds). I have an Apple store across the street from my office, but it's in a mall t spits so I try to avoid it like the Black Death. Maybe I'll make an exception.


Kathy A - Sep 09, 2008 6:49:55 am PDT #7902 of 10003
We're very stretchy. - Connie Neil

Happy Nutty-licious Birthday!!!

I may have to get Bonk! downloaded today. Oh DH is going to die.

My work here is done. (I've been earwormed with "Tin Drum" since yesterday afternoon.)


bon bon - Sep 09, 2008 7:06:25 am PDT #7903 of 10003
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Wait, I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying I should worry about the calories first, then worry about cutting out the carbs? Because I'm actually not finding it that hard to count calories.

Yes, because you are thinking about quitting -- cutting out a significant food source right now will just make it harder to find something to eat.

I have a pair of those Sony earphones. They work fine, though one wire got stripped and mine are now broken after a year and a half. But I think the fact that the rubber covers come off and become lost during normal use is a serious design flaw. (And Sony doesn't sell replacements!) Personally I'm looking for a different type without pieces that simply pop right off.


megan walker - Sep 09, 2008 7:15:45 am PDT #7904 of 10003
"What kind of magical sunshine and lollipop world do you live in? Because you need to be medicated."-SFist

Wait, I'm not sure I understand. Are you saying I should worry about the calories first, then worry about cutting out the carbs? Because I'm actually not finding it that hard to count calories. And I totally had a bean and cheese burrito that I felt a little guilty about at lunch. But it was only $0.99! And all my other meals were much healthier. And delicious. But will get boring over time.

Well, I don't really believe in diets so I'm probably the wrong person to ask, but I just meant that a calorie is a calorie in terms of weight gain, since weight loss is a result of expending more calories than you take in.

But, as Cash noted, certain foods obviously satisfy/energize you for a longer period of time (complex carbs, protein, fat). You just need to figure out what combo of those works for you. High-protein doesn't work for everybody, and is often not necessarily the best for long-term health.


megan walker - Sep 09, 2008 7:18:09 am PDT #7905 of 10003
"What kind of magical sunshine and lollipop world do you live in? Because you need to be medicated."-SFist

Peanut butter and bananas on toast (Hi PixKristin!) to add:

Happy Birthday Nutty!


Steph L. - Sep 09, 2008 7:24:35 am PDT #7906 of 10003
I look more rad than Lutheranism

a calorie is a calorie in terms of weight gain, since weight loss is a result of expending more calories than you take in.

On the most simple level, that's true in a laboratory. However, studies have shown that calories often don't work that simplistically in people, for a variety of reasons, including: hormone levels; medications a person is taking; metabolic damage caused by previous attempts to diet, etc.

Unfortunately -- and I say this as a fat person who wouldn't complain if I were less fat -- the human body isn't a lab-calibrated calorimeter.

Also, and I don't want to discourage Alibelle or anyone else from dieting if that's what they want to do, but diets don't work. It's been proven, repeatedly, that over 95% of people who lose any amount of weight on a diet -- and I mean as little as 2 pounds -- cannot maintain the weight loss for longer than 5 years.

I'm not trying to jump on my fat acceptance soapbox; I just want to note that weight loss, and the maintenance of same, is very VERY hard.


megan walker - Sep 09, 2008 7:31:09 am PDT #7907 of 10003
"What kind of magical sunshine and lollipop world do you live in? Because you need to be medicated."-SFist

However, studies have shown that calories often don't work that simplistically in people, for a variety of reasons, including: hormone levels; medications a person is taking; metabolic damage caused by previous attempts to diet, etc.

Right, but do those things lead your body to process a hamburger calorie different from a broccoli calorie? Or does it mean you process calories as a whole differently than other people?