I just posted about that in the fic thread. The WSJ has posted the judge's opinion.
Natter 60: Gone In 60 Seconds
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Dear Help Service Desk:
"The Link to X doesn't point to Y" isn't really a problem, now is it?
Pour into pie shell.
Just to clarify -- this is while the shell is still unbaked?
This recipe calls for an unbaked pie shell. Some call for baked.
Barb, heat the cream up but DON'T scald it or let it boil. Most of the cooking is done in the oven.
Hah!
For once my bad bad habit of reading Salon Letters pays off!
Someone just referred to Sarah Palin as "Wolfslayer Barbie".
I've seen Caribou Barbie a lot of places.
Wolfslayer sounds all nice and bloody. She comes with a little plane.
The WSJ has posted the judge's opinion.
Interesting. From skimming, it seems like it did come down to how much direct quoting & paraphrasing was in the Lexicon. And given the examples in there, I'd have to agree it was way, way too much. Sheesh.
But he also says
While the Lexicon, in its current state, is not a fair use of the Harry Potter works, reference works that share the Lexicon's purpose of aiding readers of literature generally should be encouraged rather than stifled.
He definitely awarded much less than Rowling & Time Warner were looking for.
Question: if You were ating a banana cream and chocolate cream layered pie, which layer would you like to see on top?
From skimming, it seems like it did come down to how much direct quoting & paraphrasing was in the Lexicon. And given the examples in there, I'd have to agree it was way, way too much. Sheesh.
Yep. Otherwise, he would have been in the clear. The judge agreed that reference works like the Lexicon were generally fair use. SVA just fucked it up.