I think the pictures without makeup are also taken to maximize the unattractiveness, while the ones with makeup are carefully lit and touched up to make them more attractive. I remember years ago seeing a spread on makeovers in a magazine. They dragged women out of bed at 5am (!), no makeup, no hair styling, no coffee (!!!), stood them up against a wall and put a strong white light on them. They all looked terrible. Then, after makeup and hair and wardrobe, they were carefully posed and lit ... and looked beautiful.
'Shindig'
Natter 60: Gone In 60 Seconds
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
A *lot* of those "no makeup" pictures were from movies.
The hives on my arms have gone mostly down. I'll check the ones on my legs and torso in the bathroom later.
A *lot* of those "no makeup" pictures were from movies.
So rather than "no makeup" they're "lots of makeup that's meant to make this person look bad"?
carefully lit and touched up
Yeah, there's the whole thing of touching up and improving (or not, I guess - more than once I find that the touched pictures lost something in the process) that's never possible when looking at mirrors, even with all the makeup and hair style and lighting.
I wanna see before and after shots of a man in Manscara.
What was the other wacky male makeup thing?
Most of the makeup-less shots are candids, which are almost always less flattering.
Seriously -- the Marilyn makeup-less pictures aren't candids; they're posed, but just with no makeup. Which is why her makeup-less pictures look so much better than the other actors' makeup-less pictures.
The Halle makeup-less picture seemed posed(ish), and it's notable that her makeup-less picture is one of the only "good" ones.
(Also, I think I've been living in a cave, because there are about 3 of those actors who I don't even recognize, in either state [makeup-less AND made-up].)
A *lot* of those "no makeup" pictures were from movies.
So rather than "no makeup" they're "lots of makeup that's meant to make this person look bad"?
See, I *knew* that you can't trust the made-up photos, in the sense that they've been colored and curled (or straightened) and carefully lit and then retouched in Photoshop (or whatever) afterwards.
But to find that I can't trust the makeup-less photos? Man.
But to find that I can't trust the makeup-less photos?
Is there anything you can trust on the internets these days? I mean, besides LOLcats....
Hmm... some of the no make up pictures are from movies, most notably the one of charlize theron, I think. But plenty are just paparazzi pics.
I think Julia Roberts is rather pretty without makeup, though the lighter color of her hair is not great.
The widow's peak and heart-shapedness of Marilyn's face is always so startling.
Is there anything you can trust on the internets these days? I mean, besides LOLcats....
I also trust the FAILBlog, xkcd, and Dinosaur Comics.
How many of these movies can you recognize by their fonts? [link]
McCain Takes $2300 Contribution from Owner of Gay Sex Site Manhunt
Best comment:
Those curtains are hideous.
If a picture of two shirtless men making out is worksafe for you, then this site is worksafe.