DJ, *I* saw your note upthread, and my bank account curses you.
Natter 59: Dominate Your Face!
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Kerfuffle Bunny has always been a hard-line contrarian.
That's his election platform.
"If Congress wants it...they can't have it!
"If the Supreme Court upholds it...I'll shoot it down!
"If the people scream for it...FUCK THE PEOPLE!
"Vote Bunny in '08.
"Discuss."
I would say I'm sorry, but I'm totally not.
Seriously, how shitty does someone have to be to rip off someone who a) partners with you b)is an independant business woman herself and c) not only brought her business back to New Orleans after Katrina- she expanded it.
Well, there were occasional periods of lucidity, but since he wanted to be President, nsm. He's always sucked for women, though. Make no mistake about that.
Oh MM - what's the link to the KB t-shirts?
www.cafepress.com/KBunny
Remember when John McCain was all independent and cool?
Oh, you mean when the national press kissed his ass all the time because they got access? That was when he was "cool."
Hehe, trying to get directions to a certain place in the Old City, I came across directions to the Latin Patriarchy, who happens to be near by it.
Also, while looking at the official Jerusalem maps, I couldn't help but notice that somehow I missed the massive amounts of small churches, museums of holy stuff, etc., and kept saying to myself "Wait. I know this street. I know three bars there and a comic book shop. How come I missed the holy places till now?".
I love this city.
In the story about how the FCC's fine against CBS for the Janet Jackson "wardrobe malfunction" has been dismissed:
"The Commission's determination that CBS's broadcast of a nine-sixteenths of one second glimpse of a bare female breast was actionably indecent evidenced the agency's departure from its prior policy," the court found. "Its orders constituted the announcement of a policy change — that fleeting images would no longer be excluded from the scope of actionable indecency."
Nine-sixteenths, huh? Who do you think got the job of figuring that out?
Who do you think got the job of figuring that out?
Frame by frame analysis, I'm telling you. ARDUOUS.