I don't know that I'd say lesser offense. Someone's still dead either way. But the second one has more victims.
'Sleeper'
Natter 59: Dominate Your Face!
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
was it a catholic church?
Presbyterian. I'm not even sure there was a Catholic church. In Googling to try to find out, I discovered there was one by the '80s, because it had the distinction of having a pedophile priest.
Well, I guess it is now. Generally, I think that juries should judge the crime and not the motivations behind the crime.
I don't think there is anything "now" about it though. Juries have been taking premeditation and heat of the moment, etc, into account for a long time.
Like I said, I go back and forth on hate crime legislation, but they were just an expansion of what we were already doing with sentences, not some bold new thing.
For those who wondered, it was a spokeswoman for the church who first called it a hate crime.
“We don’t know 100 percent what Mr. Cook's motivation was,” Susan Fani, a spokeswoman with the local Catholic diocese, told myfoxorlando.com. “However, if anything were to qualify as a hate crime, to us this seems like this might be it.”
Because what? Suddenly all the Catholic Churches would start fearing for their communion wafers? It was an implicit threat against the body of Christ?
It seems more like a hate peccadillo to me.
I think hate is probably even the wrong word. Mocking hassle?
“However, if anything were to qualify as a hate crime, to us this seems like this might be it.”
See, I would have put the inquisition, the forced conversion of pagans, worldwide condemnation of homosexuals, and the failure to ordain women ahead of this. But that's just me.
First Christmas, now communion wafers.
Hee!