Haven't you killed me enough for one day?

Mal ,'War Stories'


Natter 59: Dominate Your Face!  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


§ ita § - Jun 24, 2008 2:33:03 pm PDT #4722 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

What does a huge cultural war look like? What's the battlefield? What are the weapons? The wounded and the casualties?


DavidS - Jun 24, 2008 2:43:00 pm PDT #4723 of 10003
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

What does a huge cultural war look like?

Imagine an army line of kittens facing off against another army line of kittens - their mortal enemies. Now imagine them all puffing up their fur in hissing agitation.

What's the battlefield?

Chapbooks, broadsides, academic journals, denunciations from newspapers, lectures.

What are the weapons?

Turns of phrase, character assassination, carefully marshalled arguments, extravagent gestures, pure snark, backstabbing, weak-willed appeasement.

The wounded and the casualties?

Careers may be lost, tenure may be denied, entire departments decimated (just one in ten). Your books may be remaindered and the NY Times stops calling for your opinion.


Hil R. - Jun 24, 2008 2:48:13 pm PDT #4724 of 10003
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

I have seen an academic argument very nearly turn physical once. Never actually seen any punches thrown, though.


§ ita § - Jun 24, 2008 2:50:22 pm PDT #4725 of 10003
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I thought you had a serious point to make, Hec.


javachik - Jun 24, 2008 3:01:15 pm PDT #4726 of 10003
Our wings are not tired.

William Carlos Williams

Which is why I dearly love The Red Wheelbarrow. It's such a perfect little piece of "fuck you, Eliot."


DavidS - Jun 24, 2008 3:36:47 pm PDT #4727 of 10003
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I thought you had a serious point to make, Hec.

About cultural wars?

It's hard to generalize, but the specifics of the poetry battle goes back to William Carlos Williams (WCW) feeling that Eliot had set American poetry back decades by building on European poetry traditions of heightened, allusive language instead of working toward an American poetry that grew out of native rhythms and pattersn of speech.

(Hence the "fuck you" that javachik alludes to.)

Academia embraced Eliot's aesthetic, but the WCW strain flourished in what were called Little Magazines - basically poetry zines of the 20s and 30s and 40s.

It's the WCW poetic which informs the Beat poets as well as the New York School of the 50s (Frank O'Hara) and Black Mountain (an experimental college in the Carolinas where Charles Olson was King Poet and Theorist).

It's one reason why there was so much hostility towards the Beats in academia for a long time - a bias which is still in place. But Ginsberg winning the National Book Award in the early 70s, followed closely by Gary Snyder winning a Pulitzer signalled a cultural turning point, acknowleding the Beat/WCW/Pound influenced poetry.

One of the ways the cultural wars was fought was by trying to define the canon of post-war poetry. Famously, the anthology The New American Poetry edited by Donald Hall (the most popular and influential poetry anthology of the 20th century) championed the WCW/Beat aesthetic, largely in response to a competing anthology of post-war poets (the title escapes me) which had a completely different cast of poets. (Except, I think Robert Duncan and Charles Olson).

So each anthology asserted different branches of poetic evolution as definitive and essential.

And I was only half joking about losing tenure and stuff. There's no way you could've done a thesis at Kenyon College (home to New Criticism, and hence antithetical to the WCW/Pound aesthetic) about somebody like Ginsberg in the 50s or 60s. If an academic pursued an interest in Gary Snyder over say, Robert Lowell, that would've been a form of career suicide back then. Or it might prevent somebody from becoming the Dept. Chair at some universities.

The usual academic infighting, I guess.


Allyson - Jun 24, 2008 3:49:16 pm PDT #4728 of 10003
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica

Here's a Bob Bob question:

My nephew asked me for a spacesuit so he can go to Mars.

I asked him if he had a spaceship to get there.

He said if he's wearing the spacesuit, the ship will come pick him up.

I say this is solid logic. Thoughts?


flea - Jun 24, 2008 3:54:25 pm PDT #4729 of 10003
information libertarian

Hmm. Maybe I should start sitting around the house in my ball gown and the limo driven by George Clooney will stop by.


DavidS - Jun 24, 2008 4:16:56 pm PDT #4730 of 10003
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

I say this is solid logic. Thoughts?

I'm going to have to cast a dissenting vote for: fallacious.


Rick - Jun 24, 2008 4:27:20 pm PDT #4731 of 10003

He said if he's wearing the spacesuit, the ship will come pick him up.

Your nephew seems to have invented a child version of the South Pacific "cargo cults" that emerged after WWII, when the local tribes assumed that they could attract airplanes and their valuable cargo by recreating the conditions under which they observed airplanes during the war.

From Wikipedia:

Famous examples of cargo cult activity include the setting up of mock airstrips, airports, offices, dining rooms, as well as the fetishization and attempted construction of western goods, such as radios made of coconuts and straw. Believers may stage "drills" and "marches" with sticks for rifles and use military-style insignia and "USA" painted on their bodies to make them look like soldiers, thereby treating the activities of western military personnel as rituals to be performed for the purpose of attracting the cargo. The cult members built these items and 'facilities' in the belief that the structures would attract cargo intended to be sent to them.