Oh, wow. This place looks great. Oh, I feel like a witch in a magic shop.

Willow ,'Help'


Natter 58: Let's call Venezuela!  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


meara - May 05, 2008 10:51:56 am PDT #4979 of 10001

calories can be neither created or destroyed right?

Well, they're a measurement of energy. So if you burn up the cookie (which, isn't that how they measure calories?), you're measuring how much energy it takes, or something? I dunno. It's been a LOOOOONG time since college science classes....

I figure it probably does work out the whole flour plus sugar plus butter equals total calories. But I want reassurance!


Jessica - May 05, 2008 10:53:07 am PDT #4980 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Calories are a measure of potential energy, so they could theoretically be released as heat during the baking process. But I doubt the difference is enough to matter nutritionally.


Burrell - May 05, 2008 10:58:18 am PDT #4981 of 10001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

But when baking, you apply heat, right?

eh, what do I know?


Tamara - May 05, 2008 11:03:57 am PDT #4982 of 10001
You know, we could experiment and cancel football.

Perkins, the very top of the screen on your monitor should be at eye level.


beth b - May 05, 2008 11:08:03 am PDT #4983 of 10001
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

I'm guessing it doesn't make much difference.


Lee - May 05, 2008 11:10:30 am PDT #4984 of 10001
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

Thanks Tamara!


msbelle - May 05, 2008 11:18:59 am PDT #4985 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

ok, I added all the ingrediants in and then factored 1/16th of the measurement for each serving. counting calories is going to test some rarely used math.


Typo Boy - May 05, 2008 11:33:20 am PDT #4986 of 10001
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.

Perkins, the very top of the screen on your monitor should be at eye level.

For whatever it is worth the ergonomics expert I consulted after I got my RSI said 1/3rd of the screen should be above eye level, 2/3rds below it - that imaginary absolutely level lines from the center of my eyeballs to the center of the screen should hit exactly one third below the top of the screen. Dunno if this was specific to me or general advice.


Ginger - May 05, 2008 11:49:58 am PDT #4987 of 10001
"It didn't taste good. It tasted soooo horrible. It tasted like....a vodka martini." - Matilda

does baking alter caloric info?

Only if the food actually catches on fire.

What I've read is similar to what TB says: somewhere between a third and a half from the top. The main thing is that you're looking straight ahead at the screen when you're working, not up or down.


meara - May 05, 2008 12:05:36 pm PDT #4988 of 10001

If you have bifocals, does that change the recommendation? Not that I do, but I'm guessing if you have to look through the bottom of your glasses to see the screen...well, maybe you could just get reading glasses or something, but.