Did you actually send that, Laga? I hope that gets printed. Or at least that you get a reply. I wrote to Dear Margo (a similar person) and got an electronic reply, but it was never published.
Spike ,'Selfless'
Spike's Bitches 40: Buckle Up, Kids! Daddy's Puttin' the Hammer Down.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
nowadays I always check the TSA site before flying.
Did you actually send that, Laga?
I sent it via the form on DearAbby.com but I figured it'd probably get no response so I posted in lj too.
"When someone is IN love, he or she is usually completely focused on that one love object. So the answer to your question is no."
What was this in response to? It sounds like the priest who told my sister and brother-in-law in pre-cana counseling that it didn't seem like they were in love because they were realistic about how marriage works. @@
Serial to add: {{{{{Sean and S}}}}
it's the last letter at the bottom of the page. Dear Abby
Hosptial~ma S & Sean
Sounds like "IN love"="obsession".
I've always been annoyed with the phrase "You're not in love with him/her, you only think you are." How the else do you tell if you're in love with someone unless you think you are? Is there an objective test? My mother used that line on me, and while I know now the guy I was with was a moron, I was still completely focused on him. So either I was in love or I was stupidly obsessed.
I've been in love with a moron so I can confirm it is indeed possible
there is a fine line between those things.