Spike's Bitches 40: Buckle Up, Kids! Daddy's Puttin' the Hammer Down.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
bonny, insent.
Omnis, you will always be welcome at family functions, we loves you.
Omnis, you will always be welcome at family functions, we loves you.:: blush ::
So I'm not usually one to write down dreams, but last night I had a Very Buffista Dream.
So I was introducing Frasier (yup, from Frasier) to Buffy, and he decided his favourite episode was Tasteless, Itself. I do realise that this is not a real episode. And the board was actually a street, and how we posted was painting on white garden fences. But Frasier started getting annoyed that people weren't whitefonting, and then everyone got annoyed at him because it aired seven years ago and we weren't going to change the rules for him just because he was Frasier.
Anyway.
!!!
Wow. That's one interesting subconscious you've got there, love!
It really is. How's the tummy? Facebook told me you weren't feeling the best...
Oh, yay! On a hunch I had as I was falling asleep, I checked one of my Lit textbooks to see if it had a glossary of literary terms. It did! So, I'll just use that. But, as I was doing that, I glanced at the introduction to students, because it was titled "Connecting with Literature," which is kind of the essence of part of my argument in my thesis. This little intro quoted Nabokov's introduction to his book, "Good Readers and Good Writers," which gives me some quotes to use to say what I wanted to say with some evidence! AND the book it's from is at the school's library, so I can see the whole article and decide what to use.
Oh, this is so exciting! I love it when everything comes together! Actually, this might be what helps me come up with my title!
IORelatedN, I saw one of my profs from this semester last week. We were talking about the thesis (this is my Women and Religion prof, and she is just fascinated by my topic), and she told me that she has never seen any student, undergraduate or graduate, as excited about her work as I am. That made me feel really good, actually. Or, it just proves how crazy I am :).
Timelies all!
Facebook told me you weren't feeling the best...
Also, how much do I love this statement? SO much! Feel better Fay, and Jars, that was quite the dream!
By golly! I think I may have a title I like! And I came up with it all by myself:
The Essence of Literature: A Case Study in Oral History
What do we think?
The Essence of Literature: A Case Study in Oral History
What do we think?
I have not commented on this before, but some of the others, I was not really sure what they meant exactly. This clearly tells me that you are examining the literary nature of oral history (as opposed to its historiographical value), by examining one set of oral history. Not knowing precisely what your thesis is, from this title, I sort of expect it to evaluate oral history as literature in a similar fashion to high school students being exposed to, say, great diarists like Pepys and Boswell - in other words, exposing it as a subset of Capital-L Literature to an audience that was naive about it its place in Literature.
If that is what you meant to say, then the title gets the job done in a way that some of the less straightforward, but more superficially exciting titles will not.
Wow. I just used up my brain power reserve. IOW, gronk.