Tell me more good stuff about me.

Kaylee ,'The Message'


Spike's Bitches 40: Buckle Up, Kids! Daddy's Puttin' the Hammer Down.  

[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.


Laga - Apr 02, 2008 10:29:49 pm PDT #3016 of 10001
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.

bonny, insent.

Omnis, you will always be welcome at family functions, we loves you.


omnis_audis - Apr 02, 2008 11:28:44 pm PDT #3017 of 10001
omnis, pursue. That's an order from a shy woman who can use M-16. - Shir

Omnis, you will always be welcome at family functions, we loves you.
:: blush ::


Jars - Apr 03, 2008 12:33:03 am PDT #3018 of 10001

So I'm not usually one to write down dreams, but last night I had a Very Buffista Dream.

So I was introducing Frasier (yup, from Frasier) to Buffy, and he decided his favourite episode was Tasteless, Itself. I do realise that this is not a real episode. And the board was actually a street, and how we posted was painting on white garden fences. But Frasier started getting annoyed that people weren't whitefonting, and then everyone got annoyed at him because it aired seven years ago and we weren't going to change the rules for him just because he was Frasier.

Anyway.


Fay - Apr 03, 2008 1:17:03 am PDT #3019 of 10001
"Fuck Western ideologically-motivated gender identification!" Sulu gasped, and came.

!!!

Wow. That's one interesting subconscious you've got there, love!


Jars - Apr 03, 2008 1:26:55 am PDT #3020 of 10001

It really is. How's the tummy? Facebook told me you weren't feeling the best...


vw bug - Apr 03, 2008 2:33:46 am PDT #3021 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

Oh, yay! On a hunch I had as I was falling asleep, I checked one of my Lit textbooks to see if it had a glossary of literary terms. It did! So, I'll just use that. But, as I was doing that, I glanced at the introduction to students, because it was titled "Connecting with Literature," which is kind of the essence of part of my argument in my thesis. This little intro quoted Nabokov's introduction to his book, "Good Readers and Good Writers," which gives me some quotes to use to say what I wanted to say with some evidence! AND the book it's from is at the school's library, so I can see the whole article and decide what to use.

Oh, this is so exciting! I love it when everything comes together! Actually, this might be what helps me come up with my title!

IORelatedN, I saw one of my profs from this semester last week. We were talking about the thesis (this is my Women and Religion prof, and she is just fascinated by my topic), and she told me that she has never seen any student, undergraduate or graduate, as excited about her work as I am. That made me feel really good, actually. Or, it just proves how crazy I am :).

Timelies all!

Facebook told me you weren't feeling the best...

Also, how much do I love this statement? SO much! Feel better Fay, and Jars, that was quite the dream!


vw bug - Apr 03, 2008 2:56:17 am PDT #3022 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

By golly! I think I may have a title I like! And I came up with it all by myself:

The Essence of Literature: A Case Study in Oral History

What do we think?


WindSparrow - Apr 03, 2008 4:03:55 am PDT #3023 of 10001
Love is stronger than death and harder than sorrow. Those who practice it are fierce like the light of stars traveling eons to pierce the night.

The Essence of Literature: A Case Study in Oral History

What do we think?

I have not commented on this before, but some of the others, I was not really sure what they meant exactly. This clearly tells me that you are examining the literary nature of oral history (as opposed to its historiographical value), by examining one set of oral history. Not knowing precisely what your thesis is, from this title, I sort of expect it to evaluate oral history as literature in a similar fashion to high school students being exposed to, say, great diarists like Pepys and Boswell - in other words, exposing it as a subset of Capital-L Literature to an audience that was naive about it its place in Literature.

If that is what you meant to say, then the title gets the job done in a way that some of the less straightforward, but more superficially exciting titles will not.


WindSparrow - Apr 03, 2008 4:05:26 am PDT #3024 of 10001
Love is stronger than death and harder than sorrow. Those who practice it are fierce like the light of stars traveling eons to pierce the night.

Wow. I just used up my brain power reserve. IOW, gronk.


vw bug - Apr 03, 2008 4:07:59 am PDT #3025 of 10001
Mostly lurking...

but some of the others, I was not really sure what they meant exactly.

Yeah, that was one of my parents' issues.

This clearly tells me that you are examining the literary nature of oral history (as opposed to its historiographical value), by examining one set of oral history.

This is *exactly* what I am doing.

in other words, exposing it as a subset of Capital-L Literature to an audience that was naive about it its place in Literature.

Pretty much it! Though, at a much higher level than high school :).

If that is what you meant to say, then the title gets the job done in a way that some of the less straightforward, but more superficially exciting titles will not.

Oh, good! Waiting to hear back from my parents and thesis adviser on it, but I'm feeling good about this title. If anyone has small tweak suggestions, I'm still quite open to them.