Interestingly, the inhaler thing didn't ping me at all. I assumed it was filled with air and the persona's dependence on it was psychological. More a panic attack model than an actual respiratory problem.
Wash ,'Serenity'
The Minearverse 6: Fiery Thread of Death
[NAFDA] "There will be an occasional happy, so that it might be crushed under the boot of the writer." From Zorro to Angel (including Wonderfalls, The Inside and Drive), this is where Buffistas come to anoint themselves in the bloodbath. Oh, and help us get Terriers dvds!
Shortsightedness isn't psychosomatic either. I think the premise is that the imprint runs even deeper than that, and can tell the nervous system what it's receiving from the body. Is the nervous system involved in asthma? I don't know. But it could be possible to trigger asthma symptoms neurally.
P-C, can you elaborate? I don't get this. It seemed pretty clear that when the Actives sign up, they know they're going to be mindwiped. The imprinted personalities don't know they're going to be zapped away, but that's not the same thing.
That's who I'm talking about, the imprinted personalities. They're basically tricking the Actives into believing they ARE these people and then ripping those identities away without their permission.
I guess I didn't express myself well. It seemed clear to me that when the Actives sign up, they know that they're going to be (1) mindwiped, (2) imprinted with other personalities, and (3) have those personalities mindwiped when they're finished with an assignment.
So the imprinted personality might not consent to be mindwiped away, but the personality *isn't* the person who consented to be erased and taped over and erased and taped over and erased and taped over, ad infinitum. Unfair to the imprint, but the imprint isn't real, and unless I really misunderstood the premise, the Actives consented to not only be mindwiped, but be programmed and then have those imprints erased when they were done.
And I'm doing what I suppose Joss wants the fans to do -- sit and ponder identity -- "Who is the 'real' person -- the person who signed up, or the imprint?" -- instead of getting our rage on over the skeevy gender aspects of the show.
I agree with you 100% about the inhaler, too.
Also, the inhaler technique was crap. Maybe on purpose, but I think someone didn't bother to show ED the proper way that someone who was really having an asthma attack -- or believed she was -- would use a rescue inhaler.
(I know, now it sounds like I'm nitpicking, but I have asthma, so that jumps out at me in every TV show and movie [Goonies, I'm looking at you] that uses the "asthmatic reaching for hir inhaler" bit. Plus, someone else at the party I was at noticed it, too, immediately. Which made me feel a little better about being nitpicky.)
The more I look at it, the more I think the show is (or should be) about identity rather than human trafficking.
I hope so. I'm way more interested in identity than human trafficking.
When a character shows up in the first episode with a huge scar across her face, there's backstory.
I totally did not notice the scar at all. Maybe I was just distracted because it was Amy Acker.
And I'm doing what I suppose Joss wants the fans to do -- sit and ponder identity -- "Who is the 'real' person -- the person who signed up, or the imprint?" -- instead of getting our rage on over the skeevy gender aspects of the show.
Ha, exactly. That's what I'm getting at, though. For all intents and purposes, the imprint IS the Active's identity for that short period, and I hate seeing it constantly wiped away. Sure they consented before they joined, but it's like the way you can't give legal consent if you're intoxicated. There's no room for consent once your original identity, the one who consented in the first place, is replaced with ephemeral identities that have no rights.
So I think the issue is that I see the imprints as real, but you don't.
I totally did not notice the scar at all.
There were actually multiple scars.
Sure they consented before they joined, but it's like the way you can't give legal consent if you're intoxicated
But they weren't intoxicated when they gave consent. It's the imprints who parallel intoxication, so can they refuse?
It's the imprints who parallel intoxication, so can they refuse?
No, and that's my problem. They don't seem to have any idea what's going on; they're not supposed to be told what they are or that they're not who they think they are. I have no idea what they think is happening when they get in the chair for their "treatment," but they clearly don't know they're about to be mindwiped. Both times, Echo's persona was looking forward to doing stuff after the treatment.
Then I don't get your drunk parallel. Are you saying that drunks (imprints) should have the same right to refuse what they contracted to sober?
I'll admit my parallel is faulty. Because I consider the imprints separate people, not intoxicated versions of the original people. They just happen to be in the same body.
yes, the inhaler technique bothered me as well. I don't have asthma, but I know how an inhaler works and there were times Eliza didn't even really have it up to her mouth and she certainly didn't breath deeply.