And even if you have BBCA subscription that gives you legal access, on demand access is held off until all rebroadcasts are complete
Signed Have to wait until Saturday for second episode, either way.
A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
And even if you have BBCA subscription that gives you legal access, on demand access is held off until all rebroadcasts are complete
Signed Have to wait until Saturday for second episode, either way.
I don't mind waiting a day or two. I did the math and realized it may well be cheaper to buy the 2 BBCA shows I watch for the brief run of time they're on than to pay every month for a whole bunch of cable channels I never use.
I can actually buy that as a post-Time War thing.
Kinda seemed like a decision he had come to right then after the Dalek saw hatred at his core, to me.
I can completely buy this.
What I have a hard time buying is that the Doctor somehow missed that fixing the Dalek would make it hateful again.
Even though I don;t do FB, I consider that broadcast.
I don't think that FB is broadcast. You have to look for it (or follow it, or like it), just like a post on IO9 or whatever.
I agree with Vortex.
This actually happened: [link]
This actually happened
Heh. Yeah, I thought Dr. Who was really fun tonight.
It was. Going back to last weeks episode, my take on the Doctor missing that repairing the Dalek would make it evil again: still damaged from the extra traumatic regeneration. When Clara was asked if the Doctor was mad or right and she replied 'both' I think that was one of the points. We can expect the Doctor to make lots of bad decision and then use his genius to recover from them. Which, now that I think about it, has always been a common thread that linked all the different regenerations.
We can expect the Doctor to make lots of bad decision and then use his genius to recover from them. Which, now that I think about it, has always been a common thread that linked all the different regenerations.
Thinking about that, it's mostly true, but I think the Third Doctor might be an exception to that. (For the most part, there may be one or two exceptions.) Pertwee's Doctor was the most action-hero incarnation, and typically presented an air of command and competence. In fact, on the second commentary for The Five Doctors, Terrance Dicks mentions that he deliberately had the Third Doctor getting the Master's intentions wrong, because Jon Pertwee played his Doctor as always being right, and apparently it got under Dicks' skin. (So to speak.)
(There's at least one exception, thinking about it; namely taking that crystal from Metebelis Three. That whole trip went pretty badly.)
It's certainly true of the First Doctor. In one of the commentary tracks (The Aztecs, I think), Verity Lambert mentions that Sydney Newman gave her the advice that the Doctor should be fundamentally unpredictable. That way, they could use him to push the plot in just about any direction they wanted it to go.