It seems like the logic fairy is flying further and further away from Storybrooke.

Well it was always pretty far off in the distance. But I could not read what was on Mary Margaret's car. Was it a different epithet than last time? Also I'm trying to figure out why Granny suddenly forgave Mary Margaret. Was there something in the plot we were supposed to notice, or was there absolutely no explanation?

I keep wanting Mary Margaret to stand up in the town square and start screaming "I kissed him! I didn't fuck him! No actual clothes came off!!" Not that kissing a married man is all that cool, but why isn't David carrying any of the blame here? And why is she suddenly a town whore for kissing someone?

Is the double standard (maybe made worse by fairytaleland influence) supposed to be a deliberate point? I assumed it was, but may not. And again, given that this is the town's attitude, what changed Granny's mind? I mean the idea of a whole town turning on someone for consensual sexual conduct, if if it had gone past kissing - I assumed was intended to be over the top.

I knew someone was going to die tonight because they've all gotten too complacent on the farm. it's almost like they had forgotten that the walkers can show up at any time. no one is keeping up with where the kid is, people are going off alone all the time. just stupidstupidstupid.

I'm surprised that during a zombie apocalypse you lose track so thoroughly of where your kid, recently on death's bed, is for a fair length of time. And keep losing track of him, because he keeps ending up at the barn.

The women never have anything interesting or dynamic to do, plus isn't watching the kids chick work?

I gotta admit, I'm all about having different rules for the apocalypse, so I tuned out a lot of what Dale said. Thing is, this is still a show *not* being aired during the zombie apocalypse, so I doubted they were going to actually go against him, even if they're proven wrong in the end. Somehow, the decision, the act is taboo, unless it's clearly self-defense.

My thing is, why the fuck didn't Rick put a bullet in the kid's brain when he was stuck on the fence?

I think I would have done it. Why bring him back, heal him, and ... kill him? WTF was the point of that?

I probably would have put him out of his misery on the fence what with recent sniper shots fired at me and the horde o' zombies approaching in slow motion. But yeah, don't risk your life saving someone so you can torture and then execute them later when they've done nothing except beg for their lives since.

I have probably thought too much about this, and read too many zombie books, but wouldn't a continuous, decades-long zombie infestation require that the recently dead rise? Because otherwise, people could hole up in zombie-free zones until the zombies all wear out or decompose, always provided the people don't do something terminally stupid.

I got a hint that the mode of infection may have changed. . . last week. But it wasn't addressed at all this week.

What confused me is that Hershel's daughter developed a fever during her faint. Now, I certainly can't blame someone for going catatonic just after her mother's rotting corpse tried to eat her, but I haven't heard of shock in and of itself being able to cause a fever.