Xander: Hey, Red. What you got in the basket, little girl? Buffy: Weapons.

Xander/Buffy ,'Help'


Natter 56: ...we need the writers.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


sarameg - Feb 14, 2008 6:37:25 am PST #9385 of 10001

Now I was gently reprimanded for escalating to the boss I did. Should've talked to the group lead a level below. Well, fine, except I didn't even know what group he was in! Sorry I got your buddy in trouble, but sheeit. He didn't show until 45 minutes after the scheduled start time and that was AFTER moving it an hour later. Not my problem, people.


tommyrot - Feb 14, 2008 6:48:37 am PST #9386 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Huh.

ABC News' Teddy Davis Reports: On Wednesday, a top adviser to John McCain said more definitively than he has in the past that he will step down from the Arizona senator's presidential campaign if the presumed GOP nominee faces Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., in the general election.

"I would simply be uncomfortable being in a campaign that would be inevitably attacking Barack Obama," said McCain adviser Mark McKinnon in an interview with NPR's "All Things Considered." "I think it would be uncomfortable for me, and I think it would be bad for the McCain campaign."

[link]


lisah - Feb 14, 2008 6:51:21 am PST #9387 of 10001
Punishingly Intricate

"I would simply be uncomfortable being in a campaign that would be inevitably attacking Barack Obama," said McCain adviser Mark McKinnon in an interview with NPR's "All Things Considered." "I think it would be uncomfortable for me, and I think it would be bad for the McCain campaign."

but, why?


tommyrot - Feb 14, 2008 6:55:21 am PST #9388 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Woot! Go Texas!

Court overturns Texas ban on sex toys

A federal appeals court has struck down a Texas law that makes it a crime to promote or sell sex toys.

"Whatever one might think or believe about the use of these devices," said an opinion written by Justice Thomas M. Reavley of the 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in New Orleans, "government interference with their personal and private use violates the Constitution."

Under Texas law it is illegal to sell, advertise, give or lend obscene devices, defined as a device used primarily for sexual stimulation. Anyone in possession of six or more sexual devices is considered to be promoting them.


amych - Feb 14, 2008 6:55:52 am PST #9389 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

= "there's no way in hell we can beat Obama, and I don't want to be stuck with a loser when everything tanks"?


tommyrot - Feb 14, 2008 6:57:24 am PST #9390 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

= "there's no way in hell we can beat Obama, and I don't want to be stuck with a loser when everything tanks"?

That seems likely. Or maybe the guy actually has a soul?


tommyrot - Feb 14, 2008 6:58:57 am PST #9391 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

More on Texas:

The state also argued in a brief that Texas has legitimate "morality based" reasons for the laws, which include "discouraging prurient interests in autonomous sex and the pursuit of sexual gratification unrelated to procreation."

I just love the phrase "prurient interests in autonomous sex."


amych - Feb 14, 2008 6:58:58 am PST #9392 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Or maybe the guy actually has a soul?

I hope so. Anyway, the two shouldn't be mutually exclusive.


Steph L. - Feb 14, 2008 7:02:49 am PST #9393 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

The state also argued in a brief that Texas has legitimate "morality based" reasons for the laws, which include "discouraging prurient interests in autonomous sex and the pursuit of sexual gratification unrelated to procreation."

Isn't Texas the state that passed a law against sodomy yet *overturned* a law outlawing bestiality?


msbelle - Feb 14, 2008 7:08:44 am PST #9394 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

But why would the McCain guy go on record with that statement? Unless there is some strategy involved, wouldn't McCain just fire him now? If he worked for me, I sure as hell would fire him.