A ghost? What's the deal? Is every frat on this campus haunted? And if so, why do people keep coming to these parties, cause it's not the snacks.

Xander ,'Dirty Girls'


Natter 56: ...we need the writers.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


tommyrot - Feb 14, 2008 6:58:57 am PST #9391 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

More on Texas:

The state also argued in a brief that Texas has legitimate "morality based" reasons for the laws, which include "discouraging prurient interests in autonomous sex and the pursuit of sexual gratification unrelated to procreation."

I just love the phrase "prurient interests in autonomous sex."


amych - Feb 14, 2008 6:58:58 am PST #9392 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Or maybe the guy actually has a soul?

I hope so. Anyway, the two shouldn't be mutually exclusive.


Steph L. - Feb 14, 2008 7:02:49 am PST #9393 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

The state also argued in a brief that Texas has legitimate "morality based" reasons for the laws, which include "discouraging prurient interests in autonomous sex and the pursuit of sexual gratification unrelated to procreation."

Isn't Texas the state that passed a law against sodomy yet *overturned* a law outlawing bestiality?


msbelle - Feb 14, 2008 7:08:44 am PST #9394 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

But why would the McCain guy go on record with that statement? Unless there is some strategy involved, wouldn't McCain just fire him now? If he worked for me, I sure as hell would fire him.


Nutty - Feb 14, 2008 7:10:37 am PST #9395 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

The Supreme Court case about sodomy (the most recent one) was from Texas. I remember, because Angus came on the board and rejoiced with plans to find a cowboy who would be interested.

Anyone in possession of six or more sexual devices is considered to be promoting them.

I am curious as to how one gets to this number. Not ten, not three, but six. Presumably, it's still possible to use three at a time, all by yourself; so that could count as personal use. (Although I have to imagine it's cheaper just to stuff yourself into a washing machine, or curl up inside a kettle drum. There's only so much dissonant vibration a girl can take!)

...And I love that the Texas legislature had to think this logic through before passing their silly law.


amych - Feb 14, 2008 7:11:19 am PST #9396 of 10001
Now let us crush something soft and watch it fountain blood. That is a girlish thing to want to do, yes?

Aww. I miss Angus.


Vortex - Feb 14, 2008 7:16:17 am PST #9397 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

Presumably, it's still possible to use three at a time, all by yourself; so that could count as personal use.

well, up to five, if you include one for each nipple.


Steph L. - Feb 14, 2008 7:16:51 am PST #9398 of 10001
Unusually and exceedingly peculiar and altogether quite impossible to describe

I am curious as to how one gets to this number. Not ten, not three, but six. Presumably, it's still possible to use three at a time, all by yourself; so that could count as personal use.

If a person can use 3 at a time, maybe the 6 figure came from the spectre of a backup vibrator for each of the 3 currently in play.


Aims - Feb 14, 2008 7:18:23 am PST #9399 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

well, up to five, if you include one for each nipple.

head explodes


Vortex - Feb 14, 2008 7:20:52 am PST #9400 of 10001
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman

It can feel like that, yes.