meara! That just totally sucks. I'm so sorry and lots of ~unemployment-ma and ~new job found quickly-ma to you.
'The Message'
Natter 56: ...we need the writers.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
oh lord, meara. I'm so sorry.
After last night's MythBusters, where they tested whether or not an airplane on a conveyor belt can take off, (and it did) there are still lots and lots of people who are vehemently arguing the opposite, even after MythBusters showed it happening, and carefully explained why. I'm amazed at the length people can go to deny something they saw with their own eyes.
It kind of puts the evolution deniers in a new perspective for me.
Awww, I'm so sorry, meara.
Oh, meara, I'm so sorry! I hope all will be sorted out with the unemployment payments and a quick-to-arrive wonderful new job for you.
Meara, I am so sorry!!
Shit, meara, that sucks so badly.
Wow! That sucks, meara! I am so sorry!!!
oh noes meara. suck!
I'm a weird sort of political junkie, because I enjoy the candidacies, and I enjoy talking/speculating about them. Possibly more so than talking about what kind of president Clinton or Obama would make. Because the qualities that make someone a "good candidate" are not necessarily the qualities that make someone a "good president." And I find that interesting.
I am Tep.
And, honestly, Clinton and Obama have nearly identical policy plans, and neither one has any executive experience. So talking about who would make a better President has to be on the basis of their campaign rhetoric.
(Which, if we're being completely cynical, is driven mostly by "how angry can a black man be on TV before he's scary?" vs "how feminine can a woman be on TV before she's weak?" FEH.)