I get confused. I remember everything. I remember too much, and... some of it's made up, and... some of it can't be quantified, and... there's secrets.

River ,'Safe'


Natter 55: It's the 55th Natter  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Sue - Dec 26, 2007 4:58:17 pm PST #9252 of 10001
hip deep in pie

Well crap, I am supposed to fly home tomorrow, and there's a Nor'easter headed our way. I've thought of trying to catch an earlier flight, but the storm is hitting Halifax earlier in the day, so that might be pointless anyway.


§ ita § - Dec 26, 2007 5:07:48 pm PST #9253 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Have repaired my Mac, which is great. They did something for free at the Apple store and I've reinstalled the OS since, and most of my stuff is fine.

Watching Insomnia with Pacio and Robin Williams. Watched the original (I think) a couple days ago. I did all this because of Christopher Nolan? That's the only possible reason I can think of for having Netflixed them both.

Robin Williams.

Ugh.

I wish I were ever slightly sleepy.

Sue, I wish you good travel. Is St. Christopher the saint of that?


Sue - Dec 26, 2007 5:11:39 pm PST #9254 of 10001
hip deep in pie

Sue, I wish you good travel.

thanks. The worse that will happen is that I won't get back until Friday, and I'll have to use an extra vacation day.

Is St. Christopher the saint of that?

I could ask my mother, but she just went to bed. Both my parents are sick, and this house is hot enough to be germ heaven. I swear I am not going to make it out of here tomorrow and I'll get sick to boot.


tommyrot - Dec 26, 2007 5:13:09 pm PST #9255 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Is St. Christopher the saint of that?

I think he's the saint of safe travel. Anyway, that's why people have St. Christopher medallions on their car dashes.


§ ita § - Dec 26, 2007 5:14:32 pm PST #9256 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I swear I am not going to make it out of here tomorrow and I'll get sick to boot.

Okay, whole new patron saint invocation!

Catholicism is hard.


Jesse - Dec 26, 2007 5:18:48 pm PST #9257 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

Good luck, Sue.

Who's the saint of lost things? My mother and grandmother just did a little invocation to him this morning, and I already forget.


Sue - Dec 26, 2007 5:22:38 pm PST #9258 of 10001
hip deep in pie

Who's the saint of lost things?

St. Anthony?


tommyrot - Dec 26, 2007 5:22:56 pm PST #9259 of 10001
Sir, it's not an offence to let your cat eat your bacon. Okay? And we don't arrest cats, I'm very sorry.

Umm... maybe the meth-heads aren't to blame?

Protectionism and My Stuffy Nose

...

Let's follow the money a bit. It seems that most all pseudoephedrine is manufactured in China and India, and very cheaply, much more cheaply than it can be made in the United States or Europe. What that means is that these companies don't have lobbyists in Washington who can make an effective case for their product.

Contrast this was phenylephrine, the world's largest manufacturer of which is located in Germany. The company is called Boehringer-Ingelheim, according to MSNBC. It developed the drug in 1949 for use in eyedrops. In the last two years, virtually every manufacturer of cold medicine has changed its formula to include the Boehringer drug. Some continue to make the old formula available but only with special access.

Is it possible that the move against wonderful pseudoephedrine and in favor of useless phenylephrine was really a form of protectionism in disguise? That it was really about rewarding a well-connected company at the expense of companies without connections?

If that sounds cynical, take a look at this. It seems that our friends at Boehringer Ingelheim are rather interested in American politics, with 73% of its donations going to Republican candidates for federal office. You can see here that Boehringer even has a PAC located in Ridgefield, Connecticut. Someone with more time than I have ought to check to see how the people it supported for Congress voted on the act that resulted in a massive shift toward their product, and has nearly kept its competitive product off the market.

Oh and look here. It turns out that this company spent $1.85 million on lobbying in 2005, and this was a huge upsurge over all previous years.

The following year it spent $922,000, and it decline in 2007.

...

Now, before you call me a crazed conspiracy theorist, consider this amazing coincidence. The main company that stands to benefit from a law—passed in the name of the patriotic war on drugs—that effectively marginalizes in main competition and gives a boost to its inferior product spent millions in lobbying and campaign donations in the very year that the law was passed. There is no record of any substantial spending before the push for the law began, and spending has been declining since the law passed.

So let me go out on a limb here and say what any reasonable person would strongly suspect. The reason you can't get Mucinex and Sudafed that work without jumping through hoops isn't really about stopping basement meth users. It is really about the racket going on in Washington in which the law is used to benefit influential producers in cahoots with the political class at the expense of less influential producers and the American people, who should have the freedom to choose.


Jesse - Dec 26, 2007 5:25:33 pm PST #9260 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

St. Anthony?

Google says yes. Good one!


meara - Dec 26, 2007 5:29:58 pm PST #9261 of 10001

St Anthony St Anthony please come 'round, something's been lost that cannot be found?