I thought splitting hairs was part of our mission statement.
Spike ,'Sleeper'
Spike's Bitches 38: Well, This Is Just...Neat.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Only if we do it naked.
While getting in each other's pants.
Does lack of pants make it easier (because no barriers) or harder (because... no pants) to get in 'em?
1879 [link]
but that's not how they're using it. They're using it as a synonym for "monitor". Today on NPR they were talking about how they need to find a way to monitize (monetize?) internet content to make sure writers get paid for their work. I suppose it's possible they meant, "turn internet content into money" but I don't think so.
I'm not sure anyone is splitting hairs. It's all such a twisty and turny area anyway. I like the discussion though.
I used to think I was fairly open minded. I had no problem with gays and lesbians, and in fact stood in support. Then there were transvestites- that was new, but I learned. Then transexuals. Then swingers. Then polyamory(though I may have that reversed). But, I appreciate every chance to learn, understand and become more accepting.
Now, I think there's very little between consenting adults I don't accept on some level.
What if one is wearing a kilt?
Does lack of pants make it easier (because no barriers) or harder (because... no pants) to get in 'em?
This is why yours are smarty pants, sweetie.
With or without panties?
Today on NPR they were talking about how they need to find a way to monitize (monetize?) internet content to make sure writers get paid for their work. I suppose it's possible they meant, "turn internet content into money" but I don't think so.
No, they are talking about turning internet content into money. It's actually a really big issue for writers. How to get paid for their work when it gets used in new types of media.