Having killed the thread, let me say that I wasn't meaning to make fun. I was just being silly.
Whee! Dude, I have to stay awake through a football game still. Argharghargh.
Giles, if you would like to get by in American society, then you are going to have to follow our traditions. You're the patriarch. You have to host the festivities, or it's all meaningless.
Buffy ,'Sleeper'
Spike's Bitches 38: Well, This Is Just...Neat.
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Emily - Nov 02, 2007 10:23:12 am PDT #2171 of 10002
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
askye - Nov 02, 2007 10:25:08 am PDT #2172 of 10002
Thrive to spite them
I think I'd be open to trying a poly relationship.
I actually learned about poly relationships from MTV (the same way I learneda bout Furries), it was on their Real Life segment I think. They had different types of poly relationships. One was a trio who were a trio and lived together, the man was actually married to one of the women (they'd been a couple first) but they downplayed that because they felt it slighted the relationship of the three of them. I remember they said it felt weird if 2 of them wanted to have sex and the third didn't.
The other relationship was a 2 guys and a 1 woman, again a marired couple invovled. Guy A was married to his wife, but Guy B fell in love with her (and I guess she sort of fell for him) and they constructed this arrangement where the woman was with Guy A and Guy B, but they weren't a trio. In fact Guy B was straight (Guy A was bi, but not attracted to Guy B), they all slept in the same bed, but there was only hetero sex going on. At the end it said that Guy B had left the relationship.
Stephanie - Nov 02, 2007 10:27:34 am PDT #2173 of 10002
Trust my rage
Plus, I'm WAY WAY WAY too insecure about the one relationship I have. If there were other relationships involved, I'd explode
This is so me. Plus, while I totally get how *I* could love more than one person at a time, I'm not ready for my husband to do it.
Which is not to say that I don't think other people might be able to do so, but I couldn't.
Aims - Nov 02, 2007 10:29:17 am PDT #2174 of 10002
Shit's all sorts of different now.
I totally get how *I* could love more than one person at a time, I'm not ready for my husband to do it.
This just in: Aimee = Stephanie and vice verse.
Trudy Booth - Nov 02, 2007 10:30:35 am PDT #2175 of 10002
Greece's financial crisis threatens to take down all of Western civilization - a civilization they themselves founded. A rather tragic irony - which is something they also invented. - Jon Stewart
t hops in Aimee's lap, certain Joe will understand
Aims - Nov 02, 2007 10:31:19 am PDT #2176 of 10002
Shit's all sorts of different now.
I'm sure he will.
Emily! I have to send you a picture that will make you laugh.
Emily - Nov 02, 2007 10:31:45 am PDT #2177 of 10002
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
See, I don't so much care if my partners are having sex with other people (well, other than the safe sex issue), but I'm very attention-needy. So I tend to be sort of laissez-faire poly -- if it doesn't affect me, go ahead, but don't infringe on my relationship, as it were.
Aims - Nov 02, 2007 10:33:26 am PDT #2178 of 10002
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Insent, Em.
Aims - Nov 02, 2007 10:36:00 am PDT #2179 of 10002
Shit's all sorts of different now.
I'm attention needy so I could maybe see myself being poly, but not letting Joe be poly. But I'm very hypocritical that way.
Emily - Nov 02, 2007 10:37:52 am PDT #2180 of 10002
"In the equation E = mc⬧, c⬧ is a pretty big honking number." - Scola
Sweet! Is that Anne?