OMG I HATE MY JOB/COMPANY/COWORKERS!
Zoe: First rule of battle, little one. Don't ever let 'em know where you are. Mal: Whoo-hoo! I'm right here! I'm right here! You want some of me? Yeah, you do! Come on! Come on! Aaah! Whoo-hoo! Zoe: Of course, there are other schools of thought...
'The Message'
Natter 54: Right here, dammit.
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
msbelle - Oct 17, 2007 7:40:36 am PDT #7112 of 10001
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb
Glamcookie - Oct 17, 2007 7:41:26 am PDT #7113 of 10001
I know my own heart and understand my fellow man. But I am made unlike anyone I have ever met. I dare to say I am like no one in the whole world. - Anne Lister
I knew I could count on my librarian peeps!
Aims, normally I'd just go with it, but this professor is notorious for being a stickler on pretty much every single damned detail. She frightens me.
flea - Oct 17, 2007 7:42:14 am PDT #7114 of 10001
information libertarian
Here's the official word - no ibid. "Within a paragraph, you need not include the year in subsequent references to a study so long as the study cannot be confused with other studies cited in the article."
Their example: "In a recent study of reaction times, Walker (2000) described the method ... Walker also found"
If you have citations with multiple authors, the following apply:
2 authors - always include both names
3, 4, 5 authors - cite all authors the first time; in subsequent citations cite the first author and use et al.
6 or more authors - cite only the first name plus et al. in text, but include all names in the Reference list.
Glamcookie - Oct 17, 2007 7:44:33 am PDT #7115 of 10001
I know my own heart and understand my fellow man. But I am made unlike anyone I have ever met. I dare to say I am like no one in the whole world. - Anne Lister
Awesome! Thanks, flea! I do cite two articles by the same author, so it seems I should include the year for all so that they aren't confused.
Aims - Oct 17, 2007 7:47:11 am PDT #7116 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.
Aims, normally I'd just go with it, but this professor is notorious for being a stickler on pretty much every single damned detail. She frightens me.
I had one like that. Hated her.
brenda m - Oct 17, 2007 7:51:35 am PDT #7117 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Finally watched i Reaper last night. Damn, that was fun. Much better (sadly) than Chuck, which I may be over, despite my AB love.
Sue - Oct 17, 2007 7:53:25 am PDT #7118 of 10001
hip deep in pie
Fred, that's awesome news for Teddy!
they work in different departments, their work does not require them to work together very much, certainly not daily. They eat lunch together everyday, IM pretty much constantly, stop by each others desks for chats min. of 5 times a day for 10-20 min at times. weird? friends? no big?
That sounds like Megan and me when we worked in the same dept. Except we chatted in person not very much. (Maybe not even once a day.) and we ate lunch and took morning break together.
Cashmere - Oct 17, 2007 7:58:01 am PDT #7119 of 10001
Now tagless for your comfort.
Because our life is so hectic right now, we've been eating at McDonald's a lot. Life four or five times a week. We go to the same one near our house.
They NEVER get an order right. Not a single time. Never. Ever.
Am I just completely naive to think that the success rate should be a *little* higher?
Liese S. - Oct 17, 2007 7:59:19 am PDT #7120 of 10001
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
Ah, but will you say that when you win McDonald's Monopoly?
Jesse - Oct 17, 2007 8:03:40 am PDT #7121 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.
msbelle, insent.