Can we maybe vote on the whole murdering people issue?

Wash ,'Serenity'


Natter 54: Right here, dammit.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Aims - Sep 25, 2007 9:51:05 am PDT #2899 of 10001
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Hooray for peasants!

Bwah! Cracks me up.

My family heritage is that of supporting the "wrong" side of things. Sided with Bonny Prince Charlie, fought for the British in the Revolution (even though they lived in Massachusetts), that sort of thing.


§ ita § - Sep 25, 2007 9:51:20 am PDT #2900 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I think moist things, by definition, are not crusty. You only get crustiness when you dry things out. Hence the difference between pie dough and pie.

Pie is a bit different from dried out pie dough, otherwise we could skip the heating part.

However, I have no problem imagining crusty on the outside and moist on the inside. I like variety in texture. Maybe like an uber-rare steak, bleeding on the inside, but seared on the outside.

Dammit. I need lunch NOW. I've managed to take myself from grossed out to ravenous.


Steph L. - Sep 25, 2007 9:53:02 am PDT #2901 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Warwak, a former fishing guide, said he became a vegan in January.

Oh, so it's like that guy who just quit smoking and is high on the whole thing.

Man, the recently converted are unbelievably annoying when it comes to evangelism.


shrift - Sep 25, 2007 9:53:26 am PDT #2902 of 10001
"You can't put a price on the joy of not giving a shit." -Zenkitty

Can you have moist crusty cockles?

Sure, except for the part where I have an irrational dislike of the word 'moist.' My ventricles. My punkass ventricles. Let me... not show you them.


§ ita § - Sep 25, 2007 9:53:55 am PDT #2903 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

the recently converted are unbelievably annoying when it comes to evangelism

I forgot what thread I was in for a second and found myself thinking "No, Teppy didn't evangelise...or did she, and I missed it?"


Steph L. - Sep 25, 2007 9:54:54 am PDT #2904 of 10001
I look more rad than Lutheranism

I forgot what thread I was in for a second and found myself thinking "No, Teppy didn't evangelise...or did she, and I missed it?"

Bullwhips for everyone!!!


Scrappy - Sep 25, 2007 9:56:06 am PDT #2905 of 10001
Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it.

Teppy didn't evangelize, she just honestly and articulately shared. I thought that was very cool.


Sue - Sep 25, 2007 9:56:09 am PDT #2906 of 10001
hip deep in pie

My sister started doing some preliminary genealogy, but didn't get very far. It doesn't help that my family are of the sacrifice the truth for the sake of a good story school. What I know is that I am primarily French and Irish (The first Ozon came to St. Pierre in 1799.) and quite newly admitted, a little Mi'kmaq. There are rumors that my French side were once Jewish, but I file that under good story.


Kat - Sep 25, 2007 9:56:18 am PDT #2907 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

I have an irrational dislike of the word 'moist.'

It's not irrational. The word moist is starling onomatopoeic.

I like the soft inside, crunchy outside cookies myself.


brenda m - Sep 25, 2007 9:56:40 am PDT #2908 of 10001
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there

Yeah, Nixon. Heh. After I posted I wondered if anyone would get that. More than you wanted to know:

A group of local businessmen, who made a lot of money quickly in oil, wanted a congressman from Whittier who would protect their oil depletion allowance, a 15 percent tax write-off for the value their wells lost every year because the owners had taken the oil out, sold it, and could not replace it.

Nixon was the choice, and he got elected in 1946. John F. Kennedy won his first term the same year. Unlike JFK, Nixon did not have any money to cover the extra expenses congressmen face: two homes, the need to go places and have your wife look a certain way, some entertaining of your own, travel to the home district. He was in his 30s with two small children. In those days, Congressmen had many legal ways to make extra money. They could put their wives on the government payroll, maintain partnerships in law, real estate, or insurance firms, accept lecture fees, and keep a hand in a business,

Nixon did none of that. He just voted for the depletion allowance, with all the congressmen from oil states, and the Whittier oilmen put together a fund to help with his expenses. In his eyes, it was no different from Michigan congressmen supporting the auto industry, or Iowa congressmen supporting farm subsides. They were all serving the folks back home....

....It was during the 1952 presidential campaign that news of Nixon’s fund became a national scandal. Republican leaders and Eisenhower advisors talked openly about dropping him from the ticket. He had to go on national TV, explain everything, and prove that he was clean...

...Nixon disclosed everything they owned and everything they owed. He did not put his wife on the government payroll but his opponent did – not that there’s anything wrong with that. They have a house with a mortgage they bought with a down payment he borrowed from his father. He drives an old Oldsmobile. Many political wives wear fur coats, “but Pat here wears a good Republican cloth coat, and I think she looks great in it.” Finally, there was one gift he had no intention of returning. It was a cocker spaniel that the girls love, and call “Checkers.” And so the speech became “the Checkers speech” to everyone except the Nixons – who called it “the fund speech.” It saved his career.