Well, then, this is a day I'll feel good to be me.

Mal ,'Trash'


Natter 54: Right here, dammit.  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


§ ita § - Sep 12, 2007 2:46:10 pm PDT #140 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

If you're ever at Century City, Kristin, look at the Lucy there and pretend you've never heard of them. Not only is there no way you'd guess it was an athletic clothing store (skirts in the window might mislead you) when I was shopping for sports bras a while back, they only had 2. Not two styles. Two bras. I haven't driven into Santa Monica since then to see if my "original" one is still true to the cause. I'm sad enough as it is.

Also, I can't find my steroids.


Nutty - Sep 12, 2007 2:47:43 pm PDT #141 of 10001
"Mister Spock is on his fanny, sir. Reports heavy damage."

2. Trenchcoat-- vintage 70's camel-colored leather

Want. My own trenchcoat is a raincoat (in the trenchcoat manner). It is black.

I own several blazers, a couple of black dresses, almost no day dresses (I have one, which is linen, and two more which have been on the sewing pile for 2 years), and quite a bit in the trousers/skirts department. I... looking at Tim's list, he appears to think that you wear a basic white blouse with all things, and do not need any other tops. Which is a steaming pile of nonsense. A couple of sleeveless or short-sleeved shirts are kind of necessary, you think? Unless you're going nudie under that blazer.

And a cashmere sweater is... people who can actually wear wool should be required to do so, so that cashmere prices stay low for those of us who can't wear wool. (And people who live in Miami BETTER NOT be wearing my cashmere in their excessively-AC buildings.)


Kat - Sep 12, 2007 2:48:03 pm PDT #142 of 10001
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

I was just there, ita. The Montana one is still sporty.


Pix - Sep 12, 2007 2:49:39 pm PDT #143 of 10001
We're all getting played with, babe. -Weird Barbie

If you're ever at Century City, Kristin, look at the Lucy there and pretend you've never heard of them. Not only is there no way you'd guess it was an athletic clothing store (skirts in the window might mislead you) when I was shopping for sports bras a while back, they only had 2. Not two styles. Two bras. I haven't driven into Santa Monica since then to see if my "original" one is still true to the cause. I'm sad enough as it is.

t sobs

There's a Lucy right on Colorado Blvd. in Pasadena. I was planning on going there when my yoga pants were completely worn out (they're getting pretty damned close by now). Woe.

ETA:

I was just there, ita. The Montana one is still sporty.
Hope!


bon bon - Sep 12, 2007 2:51:29 pm PDT #144 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

I think the list of essentials itself is totally nuts, and the kind manufactured need that Lucky magazine excels at. Why doesn't one have these already, if they are essential? How can they be essential when slavishly folllowing such a list would give you a total of one work appropriate outfit?

Not to mention-- cashmere? A skirt? A pair of pants? the two latter are filler, not conceivably limited to a single item.

I have problems with the "blazer" idea because that's something awkward in a professional woman's wardrobe-- it can't match these so-called "dress" pants, and is a male staple. Cute jacket, yes. If a blazer is your wardrobe staple and you are a woman, why are you reading this when you should be toasting with Tad on the yacht.

Sweatsuit alternative? Stupid.


§ ita § - Sep 12, 2007 2:53:26 pm PDT #145 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The Montana one is still sporty.

Good. The woman working at the CC one that I spoke to on my great bra hunt agreed she didn't like the selection they had there. Which was something.

I just realised I have a leather bona fide trenchcoat (black) and a quasi-trenchcoat in dark red leather.

Hey, Kat! I may have a wedding to go to in the autumn. If (Erin and her sympathisers should look away now) that black dress with the leather is appropriate can I hang onto it until then?


§ ita § - Sep 12, 2007 2:54:15 pm PDT #146 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

it can't match these so-called "dress" pants

Huh? Why not?


bon bon - Sep 12, 2007 2:55:42 pm PDT #147 of 10001
It's five thousand for kissing, ten thousand for snuggling... End of list.

Because then it would be a suit.

ETA: I can't quite explain, but it is inherent awkwardness of both blazers and dress pants-- I assume that he means dress pants are for dinner and cocktails, which does not go with a blazer to me. Whichever way you fall on it, the very confusion here about what these items are for is indicative of the poorly- adapted- to- women nature of the list.


§ ita § - Sep 12, 2007 2:59:39 pm PDT #148 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

it can't match these so-called "dress" pants

I don't consider any of my blazers that go with any of my pants to suddenly be part of suits. And if they mutate I don't see what the problem would be.

I still cannot find my damned meds. This is irritating, but I'm not allowed to get irritated.


Jesse - Sep 12, 2007 3:06:44 pm PDT #149 of 10001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

"Match" is not the same as "go with." I learned that from Clinton and Stacy.