Xander ,'Lessons'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
In other fashion news, the jeans I'm wearing? Have a hole right in the crotch. That I didn't notice until I was in the car on the way to work. Thank dog I sit in a cube and don't see anyone for most of the day. But, WTF? These jeans are only 2 years old.
Well, I suppose that could be a whole new meaning for hot lunch. or something. I keep trying to make it work and it only kinda does.
Sometimes I just need to watch "The Mysterious Ticking Noise" again to make me grin. This was one of those mornings.
Let's go bother Snape!
HARRYPOTTER! HARRYPOTTER! RonWeeeasley...
Ron... Ron... Ron WEASLEY!
Wow! What a day. Naptime yet?
& Ceiling Cat sented them hais, & stuff, so letz u be happy & stuff. And0 sed all u aminals & burdiez & fishz go has baby aminals & brrdz & fishz & dont worry i wont watch u has sexxes, cept 4 SUPRIZE BUTTSECKZ!!!!!!!
Okay, the lolcat bible is the Best Thing Ever.
EVER.
Teppy, your dad is bonkers. And possibly bionic. More power to his elbow.
Loving the numbers talk (and indeed the NUMB3RS talk - I have a great fondness for the show, because of all the hot New York Jewish boys being competent, and because Charlie/Larry is the slashiest thing in the history of ever. And because I heart Megan/Larry mightily also. And, actually, just because I heart Larry. Oh, and also because I want to lick David all over. Mmm. So, no, nothing shallow about my appreciation. No siree, Bob). It's always fascinating to me, the different ways we learn. I guess you're probably all familiar with multiple intelligence theory, and VAK?
You might enjoy this website - it gives you a bit of a fast'n'dirty overview of learning styles and has some nice wee quiz thingies to assess whether you favour mostly Visual, mostly Aural or mostly Kinaesthetic learning.
School bitch:
My thesis seminar's next required assignment is an annotated bibliography. The department doesn't require an annotated bibliography with the thesis. So, why are we doing it? They want us to know how.
Isn't that what Google is for? Or something? Annotated Bibliographies are a lot of work.
t /school bitch
So, why are we doing it? They want us to know how.
Wellll.... it is useful research knowledge, and can be potentially parlayed into the base of a literature review.
So I can see why they want to shore those skills up. But it is a crapload of work.
So I can see why they want to shore those skills up. But it is a crapload of work.
Actually, I wouldn't care so much, except that 90% of us went through the Honors Junior Colloquium, which also requires it. So, we know how to do it.