"Skin" as a term is gross to me but is that right? At all?
Not as I've seen it used -- the parts you're talking about are header, footer, sidebar, if you're talking in physical layout terms; or nav bar (sometimes top nav, left nav) if you're talking function (since they're most often used for navigation). "Skin" isn't page structure, but the style you apply to it (like the way on some sites you can make your headers blue or read or some such shit).
Though "frame" isn't a real user-friendly term for most audiences.
Frame is also problematic because it can also refer to a specific way of coding the page, and there are other ways to do it.
It depends on how the webpage is built, though. Though "frame" isn't a real user-friendly term for most audiences.
Yes, I'm not concerned really with how it's built so much as how it will appear to a user. Actually, how it will appear to a user with some kind of sight impairment.
Not as I've seen it used -- the parts you're talking about are header, footer, sidebar, if you're talking in physical layout terms; or nav bar (sometimes top nav, left nav) if you're talking function (since they're most often used for navigation). "Skin" isn't page structure, but the style you apply to it (like the way on some sites you can make your headers blue or read or some such shit).
I see what you mean. Maybe I can just say all the pages of the site contain the following: and list the static elements.
Maybe I can just say all the pages of the site contain the following: and list the static elements.
Sounds good. All pages of the site contain top and left-hand navigation elements? (or wherever they happen to be)?
The Joker definitely has this bookmarked.
Problem is, so does the Batman.
What a coincidence--the Chicago Tribune today has an article on some tunnels under the Green Mill.
lisah, we ('we' being me and my fellow web coworkers) call it the wrapper.
OK, now Sophia's link has made me wonder just what the urban explorers found protected by booby-traps in the Rochester Crazy Warehouse.
