I second Megan!
Not actually a proposal was it? Ah well, we'll always have Minearverse.
Wash ,'Our Mrs. Reynolds'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
I second Megan!
Not actually a proposal was it? Ah well, we'll always have Minearverse.
DebetEsse makes good points
wrod
Some quick and dirty numbers:
During the 44 days (4/18/07-6/1/07) that the experimental threads were open, Natter had 7380 posts
During a previous 44 days (3/1/07-4/12/07 chosen to be easy to count) Natter had 7886 posts
During 4/18/06-6/1/06 Natter had 8258 posts
During 3/1/06-4/12/06 Natter had 10299 posts
Which tells me nothing conclusive, but they are numbers for those of you that want some.
Natter had about 500 less posts during the Experimental run. A correlation but not a proven causation.
Natter had significantly greater volume in 2006 than 2007.
We should also look at the same time period last year. This may be a summer slowdown as opposed to a multiple thread slow down. Also, we're talking about 300 posts in 44 days. That's 7-8 posts a day. Significant? I don't think so, especially since I would wager that there were more than 7-8 posts in the buckets (dear Liza, dear Liza . . .)
The second two are from last year.
right, right. Perhaps if I actually looked at it instead of just seeing what I thought I saw.
I did have a wrong date in there at first. I apologize for that.
Aha. So although the absolute number of posts was less this year, the summer drop was far smaller, despite the presence of those dastardly experimental threads.
I did have a wrong date in there at first. I apologize for that.
aha! j'accuse!