With the new board, there isn't any technical reason to cap thread size, but I kinda like the idea of still doing it. However, we could change the cap to... well, whatever we want.
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
Picking thread names is fun times. I wouldn't want to give that up. As it is it takes too long! We need to talk more!
Yes, I agree with Laura. Picking new titles is fun. More fun than counting (or searching) googoogles of posts in a single thread.
I liked rolling them over at 10,000. There was also the fun scramble to grab the last post in the thread too and nail 10,000. Plus more thread names.
Honestly, naming threads is fun.
This new iteration working so nicely on phones, we might have an uptick in posts.
Not crazy dancing uptick but, personally, I can interact more with a readable on phone site. I would never have the page open on my work computer. Likely the gov would just block it probably but I’d never even think of trying. I miss jobs where b.org could be a little part of my day.
Sor haven’t been around the board much, but I believe this is the place to propose thread names.
Goodbye and Good Riddance 2020: We will speak of it no longer. Ptui!
I like it but I think we've used it before?
I think we may need to wait till the end of the week to think about picking a thread name...
Agreed
Have we used, "get out Get Out GET OUT"?