Because they registered? Connie, did you take a look at that Clay Shirky article I posted? I had you in mind in terms of people who protest whenever the suggestion is made that this is not a pure democracy.

ita's number about activation is a more significant number than registered. Yes, I believe those people matter.

No, I didn't read that article. If Hec's summary re: what defines core is true, and if the people who meet that criteria here are endowed somehow with a higher right to decision making, then I am deeply troubled. I hope that theory is utterly irrelevant in regards to the b.org.

I'm very happy with dropping the "who is core and does it matter?" issue. But I think the issue is the elephant in the room in regards to "what is this board and where is it going."

But Hec includes people who are here in Bureaucracy - > and this thread is not only open to everyone, isn't it one of those that will show up if you hit "read new" whether or not you subscribe?

I'm with Robin. Also, I don't think anyone, including lurkers (yes! I am speaking for you!), is advocating changing anything based on people who don't vote and don't post. How could you do that, anyway? If you're only a reader, you read what's there. No big. I'm curious about them, sure, but that's just me and my nosy. We need a lurkers thread (kidding, kidding).

I'm still pro-poll, because I'm curious. I do not think poll results should be an action item - I agree with whoever said that. I would also check off a "don't change a thing" ticky box.

Maybe a number of threads (or TV threads) limit is the answer/compromise.

isn't it one of those that will show up if you hit "read new" whether or not you subscribe?

No, but it's always there on the right, taunting with posts unread, if you're at any page that shows a list of threads. If you want a voice, ain't nothing stopping you.

Sometime when I have more energy I'll tell you how man of that 1500~ constituency have read anything this year.

Hmm. I'll be back in a second...

No one said that they, as people, don't matter, connie. Several have said that their opinions on how the board is structured don't matter because they don't offer up those opinions. We don't know their opinions - how do you make that matter?

Choosing not to post and vote is a choice. No one is disenfranchising people who read only. They choose not to participate in this messy thing we do. Hell, they probably point and laugh the most out of all of us, and more power to them.

Okay, 235 people have posted this year. I can tell you that much simply.

Is it wrong that I hear this as "Warriors, come out and play"?

No, it is soooo right that you do.

For the record, since I suspect I'm one of the ones setting people off, I pretty much mean what Jen said. And I'm not anti-lurker - I lurked for a good year myself, and was an infrequent poster for a while after that. That's true of a lot of us. And I know the sort of weird place it puts you where you feel a connection, and you know these people in some way, and yet it's a very one-sided thing.

Certainly I hope things work for them as well, that they're getting something out of this whole crazy mess of a beautiful place. But we're having more than enough trouble trying to suss out what those of us who do make our presence known want and need. The suggestion that "wait, maybe there's a whole 'nother, even more incomprehensible group we need to consider" is what set me off.

ETA for fucking apostrophes.

I am lurking in this thread right now. I keep typing up things to say, and then someone else says it better. And then someone else makes an opposing point, and I agree with them too. I don't know what I think.

235 people posting, 1547 members? Wow.

So how about this for a poll, using tickyboxes check one:

The board is perfect as it is. Don't change a thing.

Splitting up the volume with multiple show threads dilutes the community.

Splitting up the volume with multiple show threads enhances the community.

*******

If we get a conclusive answer from that question we should know whether we need to make any changes or not.

And the changes could be very minor. The change could be a mental adjustment for some people individually: "When I'm voting on creating threads I need to balance the need for focused conversation against diluting the sense of community."

bon, do you think that kind of poll would have the negative results you're concerned about?

Would it it tell people anything they're interested in knowing, or is that just my idle curiosity?

Is there a better way to phrase the poll or are there other elements I'm not addressing?