But we need some sort of structure, some sort of accepted management policy, and now is the time to find out what's going to work for most people.

Connie's thread and this discussion are separate agenda items, to my way of thinking, although one has imfluence on the other. But I'm eager to stop bickering over every.new.thread idea, and find out what's going to work, not next month, but over the next couple of years.

That's definitely where I'm at. Planned growth. What is our plan? Mid-range is good. Let's avoid suburban sprawl.

eta: Which I realize now is not a bad metaphor. There are things which come from urban density that are lost when you let every subdivision just eat up the orange groves. What makes the most vital community for us?

Someone asked about spinoff threads weakening the original thread. A quick glance says that in just over a week, the SPN thread garnered 600 posts. The Boxed Set thread garnered about 400 posts in the same amount of time. Doesn't seem like Boxed Set really suffered.

1. I read B.org:

a - several times a day ...

2. I post on B.org:

same list.

Continue in that vein or some other set up?

I don't know that frequency of board usage matters as much as *why* people use the board, though.

I would be more interested to see a list like:

I post at b.org for:

a) general social interaction
b) discussion of TV
c) discussion of fandom
d) maintaining establishing friendships

Or better, possibly more specific tickybox options, but along those lines.

While voting is very definitive it does seem to not have a lot of finesse to the result. Lately it's felt like it's been used just as a tool to get people to just shut up about something for the 6 month no fly zone it creates.

whatever information this poll and discussion gives us about how thing should be handled going forward, wouldn't that decision have to be put to a vote as well?

Yes, but by taking extra time, rather than the four days discussion and vote we give a proposal, this information gathering and discussion is a larger issue. I don't even think we need a proposal and a vote to put up info-gathering polls. I think we need to take the time we need to get the info, to discuss it, aware that it will determine our policies going forward. It's a larger issue than creating a thread. At least I see it that way.

I post at b.org for:

I do think that's the core of it, really, but I do think frequency would be useful too.

I think that there are two reasons that the vote does not always reflect the common will -- 1. The question is not phrased in such a way that you can vote the way you feel 2. We don't have an option for "I care about this issue, but none of the choices reflect my opinion"

I post at b.org for:

Yeah, that would fail for me unless tickyboxes were there because I would check them all.

That's the best part of voting! Shutting the Fuck Up.

Except that we don't really. Because -- either hilariously or pathetically, you be the judge -- I posted this in 2004:

And if it were just a one TV show per thread thing, I could see that. But, if this turns out to be a general TV thread, there are going to be very few hours in the day when West Coasters or people who taped can frequent the thread. I can't go in to talk about the QaF that I just watched because there's a non-whitefonted discussion of the Alias that doesn't air for another two hours here.

We really have been having the same debate for some time now without a resolution.

I would be more interested to see a list like:

I post at b.org for:

a) general social interaction

b) discussion of TV

c) discussion of fandom

d) maintaining establishing friendships

Or better, possibly more specific tickybox options, but along those lines.

I agree. Once we have that info, we can move on into specifics.