I was kind of... bored. Which has been a theme for me lately, as I saw the Broadway production of A Chorus Line on Friday and felt much the same. Bad musical theater / horror geek. No biscuit.
River: The human body can be drained of blood in 8.6 seconds given adequate vacuuming systems. Mal: See, morbid and creepifying, I got no problem with, long as she does it quiet-like.
'Safe'
Buffista Movies 6: lies and videotape
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
Gris - Jul 22, 2008 4:36:55 pm PDT #7295 of 10000
Hey. New board.
Laga - Jul 22, 2008 4:50:45 pm PDT #7296 of 10000
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
I loved Shadow of the Vampire too.
We saw Dark Knight on Sunday and it punched me in the gut repeatedly. Felt more like a horror movie than a super-hero movie. Today I watched Rambo (not recommneded) and saw a 50 caliber machine gun tear big holes in people and was not even a shadow of the disturbed I felt walking out of PG-13 Dark Knight.
Juliebird - Jul 22, 2008 4:58:46 pm PDT #7297 of 10000
I am the fly who dreams of the spider
Felt more like a horror movie than a super-hero movie
I think... This.
Frankenbuddha - Jul 22, 2008 6:02:52 pm PDT #7298 of 10000
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
Felt more like a horror movie than a super-hero movie
Such a great way of putting it.
Count me in as a Shadow of the Vampire fan, but I know a few folks who were considerably more "meh" on it. They all agreed that Willem Dafoe was awesome, however.
Amy - Jul 22, 2008 6:10:25 pm PDT #7299 of 10000
Because books.
They all agreed that Willem Dafoe was awesome, however.
Oh, yeah.
It's just atmospheric enough that, although I do think it's a good movie for a couple of reasons, it's something ... my eyes get in the mood for, if that makes sense. Like, sometimes I want to watch the unremitting badness that is Bram Stoker's Dracula for the sheer visual trip of it.
Frankenbuddha - Jul 22, 2008 6:17:25 pm PDT #7300 of 10000
"We are the Goon Squad and we're coming to town...Beep! Beep!" - David Bowie, "Fashion"
Like, sometimes I want to watch the unremitting badness that is Bram Stoker's Dracula for the sheer visual trip of it.
See, I still curse the studio for not letting Coppola cast Johnny Depp as Harker. I could have dealt with the tacked on love story no problem with that alteration, because the movie is such a visual feast, and enough of the rest of the cast was worth it to put up with the story alterations and Winona (I mean Tom Waits as Renfield? Genius casting!).
beekaytee - Jul 22, 2008 7:32:28 pm PDT #7301 of 10000
Compassionately intolerant
Total agreement on the Dracula thoughts. If only. I can imagine a couple of ways Depp would have taken that role...both leagues above Keanu...with whom I actually have no problem as a rule.
I saw the Day the Earth Stood Still trailer tonight in front of TDK. It looks visually arresting, but I was not engaged in the story at all.
TDK exceeded my expectations like whoa. Seriously, I was surprised by what a well made film it is. I agreed in retrospect with most of the comments here, both good and critical but I have to say, it kept me riveted.
And while I was certain that Ledger's star was shining brighter due to the Deification of Death...I was wrong, he earned every scrap of praise heaped on him.
And you could really see every penny of the budget on screen.
Nice one Nolan.
Laga - Jul 22, 2008 7:51:59 pm PDT #7302 of 10000
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
D and I both laughed our way through the Day the Earth Stood Still trailer but we agreed it'd probably worth seeing for the visal effects.
Laga - Jul 22, 2008 7:53:40 pm PDT #7303 of 10000
You should know I'm a big deal in the Resistance.
you could really see every penny of the budget on screen
especially considering it cost an estimated 100 million less than Spider-Man 3.
beekaytee - Jul 22, 2008 8:07:31 pm PDT #7304 of 10000
Compassionately intolerant
especially considering it cost an estimated 100 million less than Spider-Man 3.
No LIE? Oh my ever-loving god.
Well. There you go. I saw something about how Nolan tried to do mostly in-camera effects. Real deal type stuff...which gave the scenes so much more gravity.
Versus the crap-pull me right out of the story, 'whizbang' effects in SM3. Granted, you can't really costume for a giant sand monster, but still.
I loved that I recognized so many great character actors in the background. It seemed like a bunch of veterans lined up and said, "Me! Pick me! I'll do anything to be in this movie. Can I shine your shoes Mr. Nolan?" Just for the privilege of being a part of it. Or, maybe Nolan is a great guy that people love working with. Either way, made of win.