I don't understand why Eliot or anyone would have seriously considered the idea that Nate had killed that guy.
Especially when it was determined that the neck was broken before the fall. That's an Elliot move, not a Nate one. Still, there was much fun to be had in the episode.
I don't know why that was not a consideration when they were trying to figure out who killed him. If you take into consideration that the killer had to be someone who knew how and had the strength to snap his neck, that narrows the list considerably.
And why did the detective allow the body to be removed? He knew that the guy was dead and he had a scapegoat, why wouldn't he insist on exposing the murder (unless he was worried that Nate had seen him, but they didn't throw that bit of exposition in there)
Pending getting the time off, I should be going to the Leverage writer's room on Friday. Am excite.
::joins in the flailing::
That should be AWESOME.
Let's go steal us a shout-out.
Maybe they'll write you a moon! No, got one. Well, some precious thing to steal. Sweet!