I was amused to notice that Gil Garcetti (as in the LA DA during the OJ trial) is a consulting producer on The Closer.
I'd rather stay home and watch television. It's often funnier than killing stuff.
Anya ,'Dirty Girls'
Cable Drama: Still Waiting for the Cable Guy to Show Up with the Thread Name...
To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])
Vortex - Sep 03, 2007 4:10:09 pm PDT #463 of 11998
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
brenda m - Sep 03, 2007 4:30:54 pm PDT #464 of 11998
If you're going through hell/keep on going/don't slow down/keep your fear from showing/you might be gone/'fore the devil even knows you're there
Oh! That's who that is. I kept mixing him up with the guy from Buck Rogers.
sumi - Sep 03, 2007 6:07:09 pm PDT #465 of 11998
Art Crawl!!!
Hee.
Meanwhile, enjoyable change in format tonight. Although, I don't think I'd want every week to be based around a trial.
Vortex - Sep 03, 2007 6:27:37 pm PDT #466 of 11998
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
Oh! That's who that is. I kept mixing him up with the guy from Buck Rogers.
Ah, yes, Gil Gerard. Did he ever do anything again?
eta: Huh, he's got a TV movie coming out this year, Bone Eater Sounds like porn to me.
esse - Sep 03, 2007 6:39:10 pm PDT #467 of 11998
S to the A -- using they/them pronouns!
It is a nice change of pace to see it from the trial--and I agree, I'd rather keep it in the field, usually. But it's interesting to see things from a different perspective--especially because the trial usually shows up on Law and Order, not The Closer!
Who thinks Schaefer did it?
Tom Scola - Sep 04, 2007 3:01:33 am PDT #468 of 11998
Mr. Scola’s wardrobe by Botany 500
Any lawyers want to weigh in on how the dog hair got admitted? Can excluded evidence be put back in play that easily? And if so, how bone-headed was the defense lawyer acting? It's interesting that Brenda was treating the defense lawyer the same way she treats suspects—she got him to admit something that he didn't want to.
Who thinks Schaefer did it?
He's guilty of something; if not murder, then obstruction. He might be covering for the wife or something.
sumi - Sep 04, 2007 4:33:00 am PDT #469 of 11998
Art Crawl!!!
I'm with Tom-- there is something coming - a twist - it's the wife or the ex-gf or something.
Jessica - Sep 04, 2007 5:19:10 am PDT #470 of 11998
If I want to become a cloud of bats, does each bat need a separate vaccination?
DH interviewed VK last week -- I'ma xpost in the B&A thread because he also talks about AtS.
[eta: And, heh, this is a quote about playing Connor, but it's SUCH a Pete Campbell thing to say:
I showed up to play that character and I had a lot of ideas. And they didn’t like any of those ideas. That’s okay, I’m in the business of having my ideas rejected. But after about 7 or 8 episodes of coming in with ideas and realizing it just didn’t matter, I became really complacent and jaded and angry at the project.]
Vortex - Sep 04, 2007 5:20:05 am PDT #471 of 11998
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
The defense lawyer said "did you find ANY evidence that links my client to the crime" Brenda didn't answer and the judge instructed her to do so. The lawyer opened the door. I think it's an appealable issue, though. But, what the hell do I know.
sumi - Sep 04, 2007 5:42:02 am PDT #472 of 11998
Art Crawl!!!
Yeah, it's like the attorney didn't know the answer to the question - it's not so much that it wouldn't work - it just seems unlikely that a good defense attorney would let that slip by. Particularly since there was probably some ruling that said that the evidence wasn't allowed.